There is a new 21st century resurgence, a new wave of interest and discussion of the “I am” expression statements used by Christ, especially in the Gospels. And these discussions are not without controversy, with classic agenda that cause strife and more fragmentation within Christendom.
This OP will mostly address the anaphoric (beginning of the statement) and not the epistrophe (end of the statement) expression "I am." Both styles of statements are equally important and need to be discussed however.How is Yeshua identified, at least in the Gospels
When Jesus asked his disciples, “who do you say that I am?”, the response was “Christ” (Mark 8:29), or “Christ of God” (Luke 9:20), or “Christ, the Son of living God” (Matthew 16:16). Indeed, Jesus self-identified as the “Son of God” in Luke 22:70, John 10:36, and Matthew 27:43 and the “Son of Man” in Mark 8:38, Luke 5:24, 9:26, 12:8, 22:48. Key references in John are John 4:25-26, John 8:28, John 10:24-25 and John 20:31 where Yeshua identifies himself and is also identified as “the Christ,” “the Son of Man,” and “the Son of God”. The main point of the preaching of the apostles in the book of Acts, from those who were chosen by Christ, is that “Christ is Yeshua.” This is reiterated in Acts 2:36, Acts 5:42, Acts 9:22, Acts 17:3, and Acts 18:15. [1]
The seven primary "I Am" anaphoric statements, not necessarily called the ‘great’ “I Am” statements of Yeshua as some call them, in the Gospel of John are: "I am the bread of life" [6:35, 48, 51] , "I am the light of the world" [8:12; 9:5] , "I am the door of the sheep" [10:7, 9] , "I am the good shepherd" [10:11, 14] , "I am the resurrection and the life" [11:25] , "I am the way, the truth, and the life" [14:6] , and "I am the true vine" [15:1].
These statements are central to John's Gospel and are intended to reveal and reinforce that Yeshua is the Messiah, the Son of the living God and also the Son of Man. No other writer clearly defines Yeshua as the Messiah, the Son of God and the Son of Man as John. These titles complement each other and form the basis for then clearly understanding his emphatic words or “I am” statements to us.
With this one major portion of Christ’s identity established, one is less likely to create abstract and incorrect title(s) for him, like the divine one or even by the extreme name or title of God, YHWH or as another YHWH. Unfortunately those that do this do a great disservice not only to God, his Father and to Yeshua himself; also to others new in Christ still learning the basic knowledge of who is their God and Savior, found within scripture.
Now the other complimentary other half of this foundation must be established, necessary to understand how Yeshua identifies alongside his own Father’s identity. The Father knows who his son is better than anyone. His Father planned his existence eons ago, and then at the proper time and place, created him the Son of Man, as the 2nd Adam, anointed him as Messiah, dwelt within his Spirit, within his Son’s spirit, and heavily influenced his mind. His Father dwelt in him and virtually ‘carried’ him to the Cross to die for us. The Son was the perfect human agent of his Father in many ways. This became a very close-knit relationship and deep love of the Father for his Son, and vice versa, for us. The Father resurrected this human Christ immortal, and gave him authority and power to perform specific tasks for his Father, even today. His Father has always been the source of divinity, immortality and the creator God, the creator of all things and all spirits in existence, including his many messengers, and including his Son and us. The Father God is the one YHWH (prior to this name, called the Most High).
Now with this 2 part foundation of Christ’s and his Father’s identity and position laid in, we can now lay in a course to build upon, to examine and understand scripture much clearer, more accurately, with much less confusion, especially of the “I am” words of Yeshua, of the Father, who is the one God.
I would consider discussion of this OP and each of the '7 statements' of Christ in John and other areas of scripture, all appropriate...and more
[1] (I am Statements, 2025)