Those that have no desire to hold to Christian teachings will not understand scripture about Jesus,,,
but they will actually try to defend their point of view with the bible itself.
The same bible that calls Jesus MY LORD AND MY GOD.
Thomas crying to Jesus.
John 20:28
OUR GREAT GOD AND SAVIOR [JESUS]
Titus 2:13
The NT is not easy to understand and those that do not accept Christian theology will misunderstand a lot of scripture.
JESUS IS THE FIRST BORN OVER ALL CREATION.
Since you want to be a member of the Christian RELIGION...
You might want to learn and accept what it teaches.
Here is a good explanation of the above statement in Col 1:15
The description "firstborn of all creation" speaks of Christ’s preexistence. He is not a creature but the eternal Creator (John 1:10). God created the world through Christ and redeemed the world through Christ (Hebrews 1:2-4).
Note that Jesus is called the firstborn, not the first-created. The word "firstborn" (Greek word "prototokos") signifies priority. In the culture of the Ancient Near East, the firstborn was not necessarily the oldest child. firstborn referred not to birth order but to rank. The firstborn possessed the inheritance and leadership.
Therefore, the phrase expresses Christ’s sovereignty over creation. After resurrecting Jesus from the dead, God gave Him authority over the Earth (Matthew 28:18). Jesus created the world, saved the world, and rules the world. He is the self-existent, acknowledged Head of creation.
Finally, the phrase recognizes Him as the Messiah: "I will make Him [Christ] My firstborn, higher than the kings of the earth" (Psalm 89:27).
Six times the Lord Jesus is declared to be the firstborn of God (see Romans 8:29; Colossians 1:15, 18; Hebrews 1:6; 12:23; Revelation 1:5). These passages declare the preexistence, the sovereignty, and the redemption that Christ offers.
source: What does it mean that Jesus is the “firstborn” over Creation? | GotQuestions.org
Stubborn to the end....never knowing the truth only the making of fables and illogical reasonings like in Col 1:15. And you really think Paul would agree with his simply and easy to understand context when he was speaking to his audience about the New creation for believers and men since Christ's resurrection, about the new Genesis. Why do I bother writing back to you as it's a fruitless endeavor, like hitting a brick wall.
Well, here's another reference for your records that you should read and read well because you have John 1:10 all wrong as well, as you do with most scripture when it is not sit well or not suited for your ill-formed belief system.
John 1:10 is affirming that the divine presence (the "true light" or God’s power with his word) was in the world through Yeshua, not that Jesus pre-existed as God! That would be a foolish deduction to make and not consistent with the logic and context of Johns' writings.
The verse states: "He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not."
This emphasizes that the "he" in this verse refers to the "true light" (John 1:9), which is understood as God the Father, who dwelled in Yeshua. The Father, not his Son, is the ultimate Creator.
The phrase "the world was made by him" means the world was created for the sake of Yeshua, not that he created it! The Greek word used can imply purpose or benefit, not causation.
The term "world" (κόσμος) is interpreted as referring to human inhabitants or God’s people, not the physical universe!
Thus, the verse describes God’s presence among humanity through his Son he created, who was sent to reconcile people to God, my Father.
This interpretation aligns with the broader and logical view in John's writings: Yeshua is the anointed Son of God, the Messiah, and the perfect revelation of the Father—but not God Himself. The Father alone is the one true God.
Key distinction: While the world "knew him not," the Father was in Yeshua, and those who received Yeshua were given the power to become children of God (John 1:12). This reflects a divine-human relationship,
not a divine identity.
And you still do not believe that God possessed his Son with his word and spirit in full, by his anointing as the Messiah. You had to over-kill it, and made him another God as his Father instead, because of your lack of faith in the true God and his true Son. You would rather tinker around the edges and made God and his Son fit your pet '-ism' beliefs. And I doubt you possess the spirits of truth and knowledge and understanding to know the real errs and differences based in what you write as truth.
.