...having a tattoo can sometime start a curiosity with another person, many people ask me about my butterfly , and from that I can share testimony for what God has brought me through - it doesn't always have to have a scriptural basis to be used X
Rita
In short, you've manifestly
proved it works as a conversation-starter, right?
While many years ago it was very much a man thing (bikers, sailors), yet today it's not at all exclusively a man thing.
It's an established fact that it's what nurses, carers, etc., typically will do.
BluegrassRN said:
More of the nurses that I work with have tattoos than do not. On my shift, only three don't have them (of 13 nurses). We have several nurses (including myself) who have visible tattoos; one gal has them on her wrists. My hospital does not even have a policy on tattoos any longer; it's a total nonissue.
allnurses dot com
It's an established fact from the Bible Belt that it's what many women in churches typically do:
QueenCat said:
Around here (Bible Belt), it is common, especially among evangelical Christians, for the girls under about 40 to have religious tattoos. More do than don't, especially when you get to the under 30 crowd. I hardly know any female at church that is under 30 that does not have a tattoo.
forums dot thewelltrainedmind dot com
In short, it's an established fact that, being a proven conversation-starter, the decision then to
use this means as a conversation-starter is a decision that comes logically and easily to so many Christians within - or even outside - typical demographic groups (whether or not everyone might agree or disagree).
For many Christians, what parlors can do for Christians wishing to use this conversation-starting witness means is self-evident.