God Himself has made an arrangement for the people to have an English translation, causing a huge spike in the reformation 400 years ago. The latter works are late to the party.The Holy Spirit did NOT inspire their decisions and renderings!
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
God Himself has made an arrangement for the people to have an English translation, causing a huge spike in the reformation 400 years ago. The latter works are late to the party.The Holy Spirit did NOT inspire their decisions and renderings!
You do remember some of the KJV was translated from a Latin based Greek text so you not?
How do you know it is not correct?I already showed you how Jesus conversation with peter is not correct in any English version you look at.
if it were to be truely interpreted. It would show how Jesus asked peter if he agape him, and Peters replay that he phileo him, and Jesus asked again, do you agape me, and peter again replying he phileo him, the third time jesus asked do you phileo him, which caused peter to cry out.
yet all three times Jesus said feed my sheep. My lambs etc...
see why did the English interpreter not transliterates the different works here? It was ok for them to do it with Baptizo causing false gospels they could not do it here?
face it, although I can understand, peter denied him three times, so Jesus asked him three times if he loved (English) him as a means of encouraging
but knowing peter could not even come to say he agape Jesus, yet Jesus still told him to feed his people has a much deeper impact on those who read it, than just using one word to translate both types of love like the KJv did
so no. You do not have a perfect bible. If you think you do. Well I feel sorry for you
what about those men who assembled together to translate the Nas/esv and Niv, were they are corrupt and untrained?
AKA...the word of God endureth not forever.I am familiar with the KJV translators Letter To The Reader in the 1st Edition of the 1611 KJV Bible. Every English speaking Bible student should read it, as they mentioned whatever shortcomings on their translation. Simply, there is no absolutely perfect translation from the original manuscripts, so that type of argument is moot.
Do agape and phileo mean the exact same thing? Are they equivalent words which can be used interchangeably because they are prickly equal with one another?How do you know it is not correct?
Who told you?
Oh it endures, it endures in many English texts, you just want to make an idle out of one textAKA...the word of God endureth not forever.
Did you know that similar words have different meanings per their context?Do agape and phileo mean the exact same thing? Are they equivalent words which can be used interchangeably because they are prickly equal with one another?
No, just a solid translation instead of trying to piece the perfect word of God together from hundreds of modern translations.Oh it endures, it endures in many English texts, you just want to make an idle out of one text
Bruce Metzger is the leading rationalistic scholar of the whole bunch. So you have have simply been corrupted by the promoter of corrupt critical texts.
Bruce Metzger, Beloved by Modernists, Evangelicals, and FundamentalistsAs usual, you don't know what you are talking about. Bruce Metzger was ridiculed by a liberal NT professor for being a devout evangelical with a high view of Scripture.
Yes, but not ordained in the sense that God directly inspired their end result!It was actually...but just in the denomination called the Church of England.
Not really any other church denomination...a few might but it was constructed for England's church.
No, as it was in the Latin Vulgate and the Geneva Bibles before Kjv!An admission that the pure word of God did not endure forever?
One must prove by the textual evidence that those variants and readings they "took away" were actually part of the originals texts themselves!
Oh of course not... LOL...to believe that sort of thing you would have to believe in not only human perfection but in collective human perfection.Yes, but not ordained in the sense that God directly inspired their end result!
Yes, as do not think that he held to verbal plenary view, but did see it as inspired!As usual, you don't know what you are talking about. Bruce Metzger was ridiculed by a liberal NT professor for being a devout evangelical with a high view of Scripture.
... The original manuscripts (which we don't even have) ...
... are no more inspired than the most imperfect translation. ...
They were not created by an election process. They were imperfect, yet older.No, as it was in the Latin Vulgate and the Geneva Bibles before Kjv!
AKA...the word of God endureth not forever.
The catching away(1st resurrection) is not the 2nd coming.You shouldn't mock, since you cannot seem to follow the simplicity of The Word of God that the Church does have in their possession today.
Deny this again will you?
Matt 24:29-31
29 Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:
30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
31 And He shall send His angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together His elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.
KJV
Mark 13:24-27
24 But in those days, after that tribulation, the sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light,
25 And the stars of heaven shall fall, and the powers that are in heaven shall be shaken.
26 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in the clouds with great power and glory.
27 And then shall He send His angels, and shall gather together His elect from the four winds, from the uttermost part of the earth to the uttermost part of heaven.
KJV