Natural And Revealed Knowledge Of God

[horsecamp]

since after reading the rules .i think it is permissable to post short christian videos and discuss if this series is worth while and edifing to the whole body of Christ .
if so i can post a few more in this series and stop
at any time ,

i do hope and pray you enjoy them .


Natural Knowledge of God



Everyone is born with the instinct that there is a God and that we have sinned against him. Find out more about this in the first episode of Communicating Christ Today.

http://www.wels.net/streams/video/content/natural-knowledge-god



Revealed Knowledge of God

God reveals himself to us through his inspired Word, which is found in the Bible. Learn about how God put together the Bible--the men who wrote it, the topics found within it, and more.


http://www.wels.net/streams/video/content/revealed-knowledge-god

 

[Brother Mike]

Posting links is not a issue if you have been here for awhile and can be trusted. There are many free and good resources out there that would be good to know about, no matter the denomination.

As for me, I'll have to pass.................

From the Web site.

it is appropriate for you to pray for a miracle in the lives of your loved ones. You can pray that the Lord will heal them from their cancer. But as you pray for this miracle you accept the fact that God may not work a miracle in this case.

The scripture says if we pray according to the will of God he hears us, and if he hears us, we have the petitions we desire of him.
(1 John 5:14-15)

I'll have to stick with the Word, and not some sob story about how God may not help us, or help us in a way we don't understand. We are told to know the will of God. (Eph 5:17)

I get red flags when I see someone off on scripture.

You might also consider Brother Horsecamp, that the Lutheran Church has OK'ed gays to preach the gospel.

http://blogs.cbn.com/ChurchWatch/archive/2009/08/24/gay-is-o.k.-according-to-lutheran-vote.aspx

I just warn that many around here might have a field day with you posting anything Lutheran, and you might need to explain what type of Lutheran as the Church is splitting up because of this ruling. Lots of Lutheran's did not agree with this, and rightly so.

So, just giving a heads up Brother...........

Mike

 

[jiggyfly]

Horsecamp, do you believe that HolySpirit still has a role to play in communicating Christ today? If so what do you think that role is?

 

[sniper762]

since after reading the rules .i think it is permissable to post short christian videos and discuss if this series is worth while and edifing to the whole body of Christ .
if so i can post a few more in this series and stop
at any time ,

i do hope and pray you enjoy them .


Natural Knowledge of God

in "the natural knowledge of god" he quotes 2 timothy 3 16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

what scripyures is paul speaking of? just his? his and the previous gospel writers? what about "revelation" that wasnt even written yet? arent they given by inspiration also? there was no compiled "bible" at that time. what of the apocrypha that even king james authorized in his original 1611 bible?



Everyone is born with the instinct that there is a God and that we have sinned against him. Find out more about this in the first episode of Communicating Christ Today.

http://www.wels.net/streams/video/content/natural-knowledge-god



Revealed Knowledge of God

God reveals himself to us through his inspired Word, which is found in the Bible. Learn about how God put together the Bible--the men who wrote it, the topics found within it, and more.


http://www.wels.net/streams/video/content/revealed-knowledge-god

in "the natural knowledge of god" he quotes 2 timothy 3 16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

what scripyures is paul speaking of? just his? his and the previous gospel writers? what about "revelation" that wasnt even written yet? arent they given by inspiration also? there was no compiled "bible" at that time. what of the apocrypha that even king james authorized in his original 1611 bible?

 

[jerryjohnson]

in "the natural knowledge of god" he quotes 2 timothy 3 16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

what scripyures is paul speaking of? just his? his and the previous gospel writers? what about "revelation" that wasnt even written yet? arent they given by inspiration also? there was no compiled "bible" at that time. what of the apocrypha that even king james authorized in his original 1611 bible?

Paul was speaking of the Law and the Prophets. They would have been written in Hebrew. That does not mean that the Gospels and Epistles of the New Testament are any less inspired (God-Breathed). The Apocrypha didn't make it. King James wasn't even a smile on his folks face yet, but who was King James (clue:read what is said at the coronation of an English king.)

 

[sniper762]

Paul was speaking of the Law and the Prophets. They would have been written in Hebrew. That does not mean that the Gospels and Epistles of the New Testament are any less inspired (God-Breathed). The Apocrypha didn't make it. King James wasn't even a smile on his folks face yet, but who was King James (clue:read what is said at the coronation of an English king.)

king james DID include the apocrypha in his original 1611 version.

 

[jerryjohnson]

king james DID include the apocrypha in his original 1611 version.

And why was it not included in later additions?

 

[sniper762]

they were later deemed to be taken out. my question is: if god inspired the compilation of the original 1611 kjv (which included the apocrypha), why was it later removed? did god make a mistake? did he CHANGE his minnd?

 

[jerryjohnson]

they were later deemed to be taken out. my question is: if god inspired the compilation of the original 1611 kjv (which included the apocrypha), why was it later removed? did god make a mistake? did he CHANGE his minnd?

I think you should ask Him? Make sure you use the same tone, see where it gets you!

 

[sniper762]

i already have and i have received my answer. have you?

And why was it not included in later additions?

you ask And why was it not included in later additions?

i ask YOU that same question

 

[jerryjohnson]

i already have and i have received my answer. have you?



you ask And why was it not included in later additions?

i ask YOU that same question

Yes to both!

 

[sniper762]

yes or no is not an appropriate answer to the second question

 

[jerryjohnson]

yes or no is not an appropriate answer to the second question

snip,
you will need to look it up in history, I'm not going to do all the work for you. I told you the answer once, that's all I will do.

 

[sniper762]

appropriate response for not having an answer.

 

[jerryjohnson]

appropriate response for not having an answer.

I've answered this question before for you on this forum. Go find it and read it! I know why the Apocrypha didn't make it.

 

[sniper762]

the question is "why was it deleted?" not why it didnt make it? it was originally part o the bible.

god inspired, correct?

 

[horsecamp]

the question is "why was it deleted?" not why it didnt make it? it was originally part o the bible.

god inspired, correct?

The apocrpya was deleted because they them selves gave no testamony of being inspired by God .

And some human had done a rather silly thing he put them in with the old testament written in Hebrew .

why do roman catholics concider them part of Gods word ?

they didnt .....can you tell us the year and which pope decided to make them cannoical .

the year was 1546 and the pope that decided to make them canocal was ?---------and the council this was done at was ? starts with T-------
april 15-- 1546


the year was 1546 and quickly after feb 18 ---------they were then made canonical what does that tell you ?


these books were not canonized before then.Because they were Sparius . And the pope knew it.








WAS Luther and the pope good buddies ? Would those books have been made canon by the pope if they were ?