Recent content by Davidpt

Luke 19:12 He said therefore, A certain nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom, and to return. Luke 19:27 But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. According to verse 12 there are only 2 places...

I was responding to @Spiritual Israelite in regards to you since he was talking about you in that portion of his post that I quoted and was addressing. Basically, I support your approach in this case since your approach was exposing the holes in @Spiritual Israelite view, though I'm sure he...

Let's take you for example since I'm trying to understand where you are coming from. Let's say that you die before Christ returns and that you of course go to heaven. At this point you are dead back on earth. At this point there has been no resurrection of the dead event yet. Except for 2000...

What this little season tells us though, is this. It tells us when they initially ask what they ask. They obviously ask this at the beginning of when there is a little season back on earth still to go before any avenging can commence. This little season in question is obviously meaning the 42...

In your case, I think he is simply debunking your interpretation based on his interpretation of those verses. Your interpretation contradicts his interpretation of verses 15-30. His interpretation of those verses doesn't have a gap of 2000 years between verse 15 and verse 30. Yours does. His...

Since the parable is using real world imagery, try comparing it with a real world example. Like such, maybe. A farmer has a field of wheat, but while the farmer and his farmhands slept, someone came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way. Explain how that would mean the farmer ever...

You are not following me. I simply do not believe Luke 21:20 and Matthew 24:15 are involving the same events, same era of time. I used to believe that a long time ago but no longer do. My position regarding Matthew 24:15-26 has never changed. I have never taken that to be involving 70 AD ever...

I don't take Revelation 11:1-2 to be involving the first century and 70 AD to begin with. I never did. I have always taken it to be involving Matthew 24:15-26. Except initially I interpreted to be involving a rebuilt temple in the future. I abandoned that idea some time ago. I take it to be...

I 100% agree with this, yet at the same I would argue that there is a 2000 year gap between Luke 21:20 And Luke 21:27, though. In Luke 21, meaning as of verse 20, we are in the beginning of the times of the Gentiles. In Matthew 24, meaning as of verse 15, we are in the final days of the times of...

If this poster in the OP that has me on ignore was actually interpreting Scripture with Scripture pertaining to Revelation 3:21, he would have to admit that it proves Premil, not Amil. And here is how. To him who overcomes I will grant to sit with Me on My throne, as I also overcame and sat...

Once Christ died and rose, everything from that point on pertaining to a temple is meaning spiritual not literal. IMO, the reason why God didn't destroy the 2nd temple soon after Christ died and rose, but chose to wait 40 years, was in order to give them plenty of space to repent. 2...

And the way you try and get around that, to stand in the holy place doesn't even mean to be in the temple. But if you thought it did mean that, would you still be insisting the AOD was already fulfilled in the first century?

What was nonsensical about me explaining why I am concluding what I am, based on interpretrting Scripture with Scripture? Unless one shouldn't be doing doing that sometimes, but other times should be, I think one should be doing that at all times. So, unless one has an issue with someone...

John 5:28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, 29 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation. IOW, this below, unless you...

BTW, it would be nice, but not that I think you are misquoting anyone, to also provide the links to where those quotes can be found.