Recent content by The Gospel of Christ

GodsGrace said: Man is allowed, morally, to protect himself. Jack, where exactly did Jesus teach that trusting God means refusing to protect yourself or another innocent human being? Book. Chapter. Verse. Exodus 22:2 - "If a thief be found breaking up, and be smitten that he die, there...

Yes no problem.. At this point, I’d trust an orangutan to land the Space Shuttle before I’d trust this method to land on the intended meaning of Scripture.

Hey Jack, I've been rightly dividing the Titanic and have come up with some amazing results I never knew existed in the story. Turns out the iceberg was from a different dispensation. The Titanic that left Southampton was apparently under the Pre-Iceberg Administration, while the Titanic that...

If rejecting the real Christ and replacing Him with a false picture means you "hate Christ," then apply the standard consistently. Islam accepts Jesus as the Messiah, a uniquely honored prophet and messenger of God, born miraculously of Mary, but rejects that He is thee singular divine Son of...

God doesn't need my permission for anything and Romans 13 still doesn't say what you're claiming it says. That's the whole point. God's sovereignty does not magically turn your interpretation into Scripture. You still have to prove that “appointed by God” means “everyone who opposed that...

The problem is that you're adding a conclusion that Scripture doesn't contain. “There is no authority except from God” does not mean “God personally controls every decision every ruler makes.” “The authorities that exist are appointed by God” does not mean “everyone who opposed them opposed...

If God is sovereign over who ultimately holds authority, then He doesn't need me to correctly guess the election winner in order to “appoint” anyone. That's the entire problem with your argument. Romans 13 says authorities ultimately exist under God. It does not say the individual voter who...

So you're saying that the Zionists in modern, non-biblical Israel follow the antichrist???

They believe Jesus was a genuine prophet and Messiah who performed miracles by God’s permission. They deny that He is literally the divine Son of God in the Christian sense, but thats very different from simply “hating Christ” or treating Him as some evil figure. Tehran even has an explicitly...

That actually illustrates the difference between us perfectly. When Scripture is silent about whether Noah used stairs, ladders, ramps, or something else, I say, “We don’t know.” I don’t invent a staircase, bolt it into the Ark, and then start defending it as though Genesis told me it was...

You seriously read “T. rex and the dragon from The Hobbit” as a literal concession? That's staggering. That was sarcasm. I was mocking the move from “Genesis says X” to “well, maybe this unstated thing happened.” You’re still confusing physical possibility with textual support. I don’t care...

I’m citing God’s infallible Word. You’re patching holes in a doctrine the text itself doesn't support with sentences God never spoke. Your interpretation survives only by inventing material Scripture never gave you and then smuggling it back into the Bible as though it belonged there. And...

1. Sure... Noah could've taken juvenile dinosaurs. He could’ve had a T. rex and the dragon from The Hobbit on board too. But Genesis doesn’t say any of that. You’ve changed the standard from “What does God’s Word say?” to “What can I imagine might have happened?” Those are not the same thing...

“Two juvenile Brontosauruses... that works. I trust you stand corrected.” Ah, perfect. There it is... the completely unstated assumption required to rescue the completely unstated interpretation. You couldn’t prove the first claim from the text, so you simply added a second claim you can’t...

Yes, I’ll stay on my "game" - God’s raw Word. You can get back to yours ^ ... ignoring the Hebrew and defending a system the Scripture never actually states.