tim from pa,
Fella, I have more scriptures than you can shake a stick at. But I'd be wasting my time trying to convince someone who can't make sense out of something that hits one straight in the face.As for verses like Jeremiah 22:30, passages in Ezekiel 17 and Ezekiel 21 that you use to disprove an earthly throne, I actually use to prove there's one.Have you been open-minded enough to look at my genealogy in my signature? I though not. The same passages you (mis)quoted are used to explain it.As for Jesus being cursed because of Jeremiah 22:30, tell me why pray tell you'd want to worship a so-called Messiah that does not have the right to reign in Judah if the need arose, but he can reign from heaven? Tell me the logic in that? Never mind I asked.
But it has never been the Gospel from the beginning. It is a man's personal interpretation of just the last 100 years. The Gospel was once given, for all, for all time, Jude 3. There is no revelation of private individuals. All false teachings are based on scripture. To say you can develop a dogma from scripture has been proven in history so many times it is making scripture of non-effect. Just how many versions of dispensationalists are there? The fact that there is more than one is proof that Scripture can be abused and that anyone can develop whatever view they desire and claim it to be scripture. This is a sign of the last times. Fifty years from now, your view will be history and there will be a much more distinctive version competing with still more alternative views, it is endless. Hardly the Gospel ONCE given. Jude 3. Hardly a Gospel that has been preserved by the Holy Spirit until the end of time. The fact it is of very recent origin and a variety of veiws could hardly be the work of the Holy Spirit either. You place individual man's interpretative ability of the Bible above the ONCE given Gospel to the Saints. You place much more emphasis on a God derived by man's thinking than the ONE revealed to us by God Himself. As for hitting someone in the face, it seems that the Gospel didn't come until you were born. You seem to forget that it has been around for 2000 years already and Dispensationalism has never been the content of Christianity ever. The very fact it is not the universal Gospel even today speaks volumes against its validity.
Fella, I have more scriptures than you can shake a stick at. But I'd be wasting my time trying to convince someone who can't make sense out of something that hits one straight in the face.As for verses like Jeremiah 22:30, passages in Ezekiel 17 and Ezekiel 21 that you use to disprove an earthly throne, I actually use to prove there's one.Have you been open-minded enough to look at my genealogy in my signature? I though not. The same passages you (mis)quoted are used to explain it.As for Jesus being cursed because of Jeremiah 22:30, tell me why pray tell you'd want to worship a so-called Messiah that does not have the right to reign in Judah if the need arose, but he can reign from heaven? Tell me the logic in that? Never mind I asked.
But it has never been the Gospel from the beginning. It is a man's personal interpretation of just the last 100 years. The Gospel was once given, for all, for all time, Jude 3. There is no revelation of private individuals. All false teachings are based on scripture. To say you can develop a dogma from scripture has been proven in history so many times it is making scripture of non-effect. Just how many versions of dispensationalists are there? The fact that there is more than one is proof that Scripture can be abused and that anyone can develop whatever view they desire and claim it to be scripture. This is a sign of the last times. Fifty years from now, your view will be history and there will be a much more distinctive version competing with still more alternative views, it is endless. Hardly the Gospel ONCE given. Jude 3. Hardly a Gospel that has been preserved by the Holy Spirit until the end of time. The fact it is of very recent origin and a variety of veiws could hardly be the work of the Holy Spirit either. You place individual man's interpretative ability of the Bible above the ONCE given Gospel to the Saints. You place much more emphasis on a God derived by man's thinking than the ONE revealed to us by God Himself. As for hitting someone in the face, it seems that the Gospel didn't come until you were born. You seem to forget that it has been around for 2000 years already and Dispensationalism has never been the content of Christianity ever. The very fact it is not the universal Gospel even today speaks volumes against its validity.