Search results

Hi Guestman, If your assertion is correct, then why does Dan. 2:41 & 45 depict FIVE world empires, versus the Four which you ascribe? Dan. 2 41 And as you saw the feet and toes partly of potter’s clay and partly of iron, it shall be a divided kingdom 45 ... the iron, the bronze, the clay, the...

To All, 21. And Daniel continued even unto the first year of king Cyrus. 2l. Et fuit Daniel usque ad annum primum Cyri regis. Expositors are puzzled with this verse, because, as we shall afterwards see, the Vision occurred to Daniel in the third year of Cyrus’s reign. Some explain the word...

Hi Floyd, Re: Don't Answer ANYONE until ... Sorry, -- I was being facetious, and apparently that didn't come thru. The fact is, we need to take a clue, and either validate it or invalidate from our own research. We should NEVER blindly follow what others say. Thus Walvoord, Newton, Church...

Hey RANDOR, Good call. -- Now can you help Floyd answer the "puzzle"? :) With Best Regards, DD

Hi Floyd, Please do not answer ANYONE on ANY SUBJECT, until you read Walvoord's book, and then Church's book, then Newton's book, and then Calvin's book, and then, and then, and then. Floyd, if you can't take a clue and arrive to the TRUTH, then the Holy Spirit is not within you. Please ask...

Hi Floyd, Did you solve them yet? With Best Regards, DD PS The solution to Dan. 2:41 & 45 first puzzle, is that there are FIVE world empires, for which the FIFTH is "divided" as evidenced by today's 3-superpowers. The second puzzle is still waiting your solution.

Hi Marcus, This thread pertains to your sequence of events in Revelation, which cross into the prophecies of Daniel, for which I've provided concrete scholarly input, which you've discounted in deference to "other" commentators. And where Scripture says to let two or three prophets speak and...

Hi Marcus, Certainly each of us must arrive to our own doctrines, but it would seem a simple process to invalidate various tenants based upon simple tests typical of: Is the Daniel 2:45 -- 4,3,5,2,1 -- Intelligent Design, or was GOD distracted when HE confused the order? Did GOD intend the...

Hi Marcus, I did not intend to derail your Topic, but simply point out that a seven-year Tribulation is a False doctrine, and that your assertions regarding Daniel 11 are based upon a False rendering of that end-time prophecy. If you wish to ignore this advice, then please do so. If you wish...

To All, "Mystery Babylon" really shouldn't be a "mystery". Have none of you followed NYC's attempt to restrict the size of a soft drink? The Babylonian empire was “the first true metropolis in western history, a business as well as an administrative center,”[1] -- the prototype of...

Hi Marcus, Please accept the following response: 1. The years are literal years, as validated by the Prophetic Psalms, per the premise "Hidden Prophecies In The Psalms", by J.R. Church. Please read Psalms 24 to find the "going forth of the word", which Young (per Walvoord) observed IS NOT...

Hi Marcus, Please allow the following synopsis: Daniel 9 1. The durations are "years", (at least one must be a "week" of years) 2. Daniel did not read the book of Jeremiah to interpret the seventy (he read the Psalms) 3. The word "weeks" is in the unusual inconcise Masculine gender text 4...

Hi Marcus, Perhaps it's not an explanation that is lacking, but conformance. As such, your Daniel expository stands in contradiction with both Scripture and History.j With Best Regards, DD

Hi Marcus, Where I would propose that many have proficiencies in SOME Chapters/Verses, that few (read: none) have all expertise. And where I've suggested that absence regarding Daniel 9, I now propose the same for Daniel 11. But toward this, I would agree with the greater number of points...

Hi John S, Some Forum participants share their thoughts. Others just share. With Best Regards, DD

To All, If you wish to comment on the following points, but don't have anything to say, please wait until you have something to say. Daniel 11 is NOT an ancient prophecy. 1. The 10:1 context demands a Babylonian era. 2. Darius was the LAST Babylonian king, thus he had to be...

To All who might be interested, Daniel 11 is NOT an ancient prophecy. 1. The 10:1 context demands a Babylonian era. 2. Darius was the LAST Babylonian king, thus he had to be "strengthened". 3. The "three more" and "fourth" speak to the Silver - Medo/Persian; Bronze - Grecian; Iron -...

Good luck. DaDad

Hi brakelite, I'm always surprised how so many "disagree" with a doctrine, but provide an explanation which defies intelligent thought. How is it that a VICTORIOUS "Darius" needs strengthening?!? After the U.S. defeated Germany and Japan, did we need someone to tell us how powerful we...

To All, For validation, one might wish to consider Daniel 11:5 5 “Then the king of the south shall be strong, but one of his princes shall be stronger than he and his dominion shall be a great dominion. To keep in context, this verse follows the WWII depiction of Hitler's conquest (N, E., W...