Search results

its more likely he is a programmed forum bot and not a human to begin with

I want you to show specifically and exactly in detail what you call this "unrighteousness" and differentiate it from a regular Believer sinning? Then explain the exact criteria for this "judgement" you claim

No, you need to get better information and not from Awake or the Watchtower either.

Your reasoning is flawed, that's why. I gave you the context and even historical understanding yet you still don't see.

Coming from a JW, your views on scripture carry little weight but lets look at a few to drive that point home No, many different circumstances covering many different scenarios. Scripture is letters to churches for specific things- not an owners and maintenance manual. No, they were the...

Well it needs to be noted that specifically the church at Corinth was noted even then as "sin city" (even the Romans viewed it as extreme) with a heavy population of Aphrodite and Artemis (Diana the wiccan goddess in other cultures is thought to also be her) cults so its pretty expected that new...

You hide behind that word to try and justify your falsehoods yet you never produce anything to substantiate the claims you make that you claim are from Scripture. Reminds me of a story about a serpent and a fruit

First ALL articles are considered hearsay and propaganda for the simple fact that there are no controls whatsoever on the media so articles quoting articles and fact checking based on articles is nothing more that everything times ZERO is still zero. Gossip repeated doesn't "prove" gossip. I...

I'm glad you're glad but that doesn't add a shred of legitimacy to anything. That's a propaganda piece. (I would ask if you actually understand anything about anything they are saying or the processes involved but I already know) Notice they "tell" you all about it (a sales technique) but...

apples to alternators comparison Have you actually seen, read and verified this "evidence"?

Then why are there equally "highly educated trained professionals" both speaking out against them and being intimidated into silence? That's an appeal to authority fallacy. In science EVERY point has to stand on its own merits and is zero based. How is that relevant? Wouldn't it be more...

Ever heard of a scripture that says "place not your faith in man"? Devin, people lie, sell out and promote evil agendas every day in every subject. You cannot simply "accept" things on the surface as truth for fear of hurting someone's feelings. That's not only unwise but dangerous. A puff...

The thing is, I didn't create the scientific method, rules of evidence and the review processes- they were old when I was young. They are all there for a reason and part of that reason is the best most honest, unbiased and accurate result possible. To not demand such rigor is to invite any...

That's like saying a persons lack of knowledge is the basis for being able to confirm knowledge of a subject. (it implodes upon itself) Honestly Devin, following the truth is usually easy- getting TO THE TRUTH is often a different matter. That's not true at all. Witness statements are known...

If that's true then you should DEMAND full transparency, access to ALL baseline data used in the decision making review and a QUALIFIED VETTING PROCESS ( if for no other reason that simple error proofing) Anything short of that is not exercising due diligence in "protecting" anything

That's the PURPOSE AND REASON for doing it and one of the 2 first MAJOR steps in any peer review. You establish the CREDENTIALS first then the MOTIVATIONS second. A "study" by the unqualified is bogus from the outset and a "study" that is biased is NOT LEGITIMATE. That's an appeal to...

Ahh, that says a lot. It tells me you know you are deliberately and willfully pushing propaganda over legitimate science. Here's how ( based on statement analysis and Reid Techniques) A trained person would know every point I made is not only correct but literally part of every review standard...

You hide behind your own deeds and always evade direct questions which is an indicator that you are aware of your deception and its deliberate.

OK, lets test that theory. First, what is your degree field in as it applies to Science as a discipline and your legitimate qualifications as well as your experience in legitimate studies and their review? I do this because I have put most of mine on another thread but you have directly...

No, lets look at ALL the data