Search results

The part you omitted When you talk down to people and treat them as children how do you think they should respond? I said skip to the point. I already said water is water, the Lord is not water , etc etc. Make your point and we can go from there.

Has there ever been a trin that could explain how it's not breaking this command? I like you wrangler, straight to the point and you don't sugar coat a thing. Reminds of my mamaw, full blood apache, you didn't mess with her and she wasn't scared to tell you how she "really" feels about...

And unlike many other scientist, he was not atheist. So in conclusion Newton was deeply spiritual. studied scripture the same way he studied science. On of the smartest men of all time. And he takes one look at the trinity and concludes it is bogus. One of his fundamental points was that you...

It doesn't matter, angels DO NOT act on their own authority. Show me a scripture there angels act independent or add their own name to the work of the Lord. Also I do not watch cartoon videos, make your point or move on.

you ever read Isaac Newtons writings on the trinity? he proposed the trinity represented the fallen church of revelation. he also had access to the library at trinity college (ironic) and read a lot on the early church, pre rome, and believed he found lots of proof that the early church fathers...

when the Lord uses an angel, its an act of the Lord. when the Lord says "our" image, its still the image of the Lord. you are free to prove me wrong, simply provide a scripture where angels act independently of the Lord. when i repeated the question: "how does it exist in these different...

there is also no controversy in the early days. the pharisees were always testing Jesus, they never once tested Jesus with the trinity. then you have all the early church conflicts, circumcision for the gentiles, food laws, giving thanks for food, but no trinity conflict. what food we eat, big...

and already you are starting off on the wrong foot. its not the Most High "and" angels. its the Most High. when the Most High sends an angel, its the Most High. if an angel gets sent down to our world to plant a tree, the tree was planted by the Most High. when sodom was destroyed by angels...

If same they would have different answers. You run run from this because it proves you wrong, look at all these hoops your going through, it's so sad, all this to avoid a question. I never seen some dig a hole this deep The sodom question proves my point. You know I am right because you will...

i am a big reader of the dead sea scrolls. not an expert but i do enjoy the insight to the way people thought in the early days. most all theology experts, as well as me agree that the Essenes were the sect of John the baptist. the Essenes are mostly known for the Hebrew bible text that they...

i have already proved that the Lord uses angels to destroy cities and the bible credits the destruction to the Lord. here are a few more examples of the Lords council. Isaiah 14:13, 14 13 “But you said in your heart, ‘I will ascend to heaven; I will raise my throne above the stars of God, And I...

your claiming angels were not used because the Lord created, not angels, had angels been involved it would not have been an act of the Lord. any act of angels is an act of the Lord, they do not act on their own. that is what is being explained to you time and time again, you refuse to accept it...

Your not understanding it. Your taking these symbolic / metaphorical passages and trying to make them into something else. When you do this, and it contradicts other passages, it means your not understanding it. If the Father is spirit, and all spirit was in Jesus, then there would be no spirit...

The spirit of the Most High can be in 50 million places at once, it doesn't mean they are all the Most High. The spirit was in Elijah no one confused him with the Most High

So one Most High was in the heavens, and another was down here in this world. Ohh boy smh

If a JW says Jesus is Jewish it means Jesus is now not Jewish?

So psalm 82 where the Most High is judging the sons of the Most High, this is actually the Most High judging His other Most High selves /persons? how many Most High s do you think there are?

Gult by association, that's your best rebuttal?

the problem is that Jesus never says I am the great I Am, you have to add this into the scripture, kinda like 1 John 5 7 was added. Claiming to be a son of the Most High is not claiming to be the Most High which is what Jesus did. Making yourself "elohim " is claiming to be a son of the Most...

The bible says the Most High does not change, trinity says He does. Trinity always causes conflict.