Search results

TRULY ELMO, the scripture you posted concerning adding or taking away refers onlt to the book of revelation

those statements ONLY applied to john;s book of revelation

just my observation in talking with christians who live by different translations.

people choose the translation that most closely justifies their actions. sad but true

why do athiests keep demanding "evidence" of god's existence or biblical beliefs from christians when THERE IS NONE? why do christions keep trying to present "evidence" of god's existence or of biblical beliefs to athiests when THERE IS NONE the only evidence that could prove or disprove...

when i attended church regularly, i was held back being a non-tith payer

THAT 10% would make quite a noticeable difference in the normal collection amount. easy enough to substanciate his claim. was tthat ever investigated or discounted?

the issue that i present is not the earth's age, but the age of MAN. all theologians agree that the date of the biblical adam can be traced to approximately 4000bc. therefore any scientific or paleantolical findings that predate that seem to be constru ed by fundemental christians as anti-biblical.

you say ; No blood was shed in Genesis 3:21: Unto Adam also and to his wife did the LORD God make coats of skins, and clothed them. Notice the Lord MADE the skins to clothe Adam and Eve, He did not kill anything to make those skins. God clothed them with mortality. That skin was their...

WOW, THESE PEOPLE PRE-DATE THE CREATION OF ADAM The placement of artifacts and materials within an Archaic burial site indicated social differentiation based upon status.[53] There is a continuous record of occupation of S'ólh Téméxw by Aboriginal people dating from the early Holocene period...

so YOU may interpret to be not subjected to mortal man's imperfections......i, on the other hand, know better.

fyi, god didn't do it, mathew did

oh, i got it.....like youve got 10 $1 bills and you give 1-4 to one person =4 dollars, 4-7 to another=4 dollars and 7-10 to another=4 dollars COOL.....i just turned $10 into $12..........LOOKS GOOD ON PAPER

here is the scripture 1 The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of aDavid, the son of Abraham. 2 aAbraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat bJudas and his brethren; 3 And Judas begat aPhares and bZara of Thamar; and Phares begat cEsrom; and Esrom begat Aram...

notice josias and jechonias are already acconted for in the second set of 14 generaations Abraham - Isaac - Jacob - Judas - Phares - Esrom - Aram - Aminadab - Naasson - Salmon - Booz - Obed - Jesse - David = 14 generations From David: Solomon - Roboam - Abia - Asa - Josaphat - Joram - Ozias -...

i dont see him listed twice in the scriptures. in order toj justiffy equalling 14 generationns, you would have to COUNT him twice

REGARDLESS of who made the error and why, the math shows that there was NOT three series of 14 generations as scripture states, correct? just proves one of many descrepncies in bible scripture.

you say it was God and he did not do so for the purpose of a sacrifice to himself there was no sacrifice they were simply killed for their skins. thats why they were made, for the benefit of man

YOUR father and father-in-law is determined by today's standards which have changd drastically from days of old. the differences between mathew and luke's genealogies comes from their difference in research, just like there is differences in lineage of similar families in genealogical...

you say The reason why Heli is said to be Josephs father is because when Mary and Joseph married, Heli did become Josephs father...a father by law.. PROPOSTEROUS in those days women had very little status, much less namesake. joseph would never had taken HER father as his.