Search results

Try reading links before posting them.

Lets see: "The Cambridge Dictionary defines “insurrection”" That is nice but useless. What is the legal definition in the United States? "By that definition, there was no “insurrection” at the United States Capitol on Jan. 6" a definition meaningless when it to comes to the law. "said a...

:jest:

If so then this brief should be dismissed almost immediately.

Violence is always the go to response for the far right.

Hate is always a choice.

and Brazilian law identifies that there are different levels of "slurs" and hate speech. Specifically, the court case centered on the fact that 1997 Brazil’s legislature ended separately defining hate speech against a group, and hate speech against an individual for every group except LGBT...

Only photo shop knows

I bet they think she has cooties to. Is this really the best you can do?

Wow what is the world coming to? Shame on Brazil for making death threats based on being LGBT have the same consequences as death threats based on someone having a different skin color

Interesting choice of words as Trump is the one how has bragged about sexually assaulting girls participating in the Miss Teen USA pageant.

According to who? Trump? I remember when he tried to claimed "“Under my administration, 7 million Americans have come off of food stamps, and 10 million people have been lifted off of welfare.” Which is utter bull, 7 million didn't come off of food stamps he just slashed eligibility. Sadly...

its got nothing to do with twitter

Logical fallacy Non Sequitur: A non sequitur is a logical fallacy that means "does not follow" in Latin. It occurs when the conclusion does not follow logically from the premises or the reason given for an action is irrelevant to that action. A non sequitur can result from various errors in...

In order to legally apply and be legally hired non-citizens even refugees have to have a green card. Again...in order to even legally apply for a position they have to be federally approved to interact with controlled information and that approval is part of their green card.

and again if they are in possession of a green card and therefore eligible for employment then they are cleared for such exposure.

It doesn't mean it won't be either. At issues i the long history of SpaceX removing specific groups of people form even consideration for a position. Evidence of hardships?

In its lawsuit the Justice Department notes that the approval to have access to controlled data is part of the individual's green card the lawsuit also notes that the positions in question included both ones requiring advanced degrees and others such as welders, cooks and crane operators at the...

It wasn't difficult to expose all those lies. I had no illusions that you would respond in a meaningful way and i have no doubt that you will continue to repeat all those lies over and over and over again.

Maybe that has something to do with being a serial adulterer - or with employing women for sex or with sexually assaulting teenage girls and then bragging about it. or when maybe it has something to do with engaging in censorship or trying to suspend the constitution or the insurrection or...