Search results

The correct definition is: "Abusive or threatening public speech that expresses hate or advocated discrimination or encourages violence towards a person or group based on something such as race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation." The bible isn't speech. Only people produce speech. Ah...

Rights like being able to walk into a business being able to purchase the same goods and services as everyone else? or the right to go to your doctor and together decide the best treatment options for you and our family?

Ask teachers in Florida about the revocation of freedom of speech....(they might not be allowed to answer you.

I always chuckle when Conservatives go on about how they are bastions of "truth"

Conservatives will beleive anything

her e-amils were subpoenaed not her cell phone.

There is nothing on the search warrant receipt that was not specified in the warrant. No passports. No underwear

Try actually reading the law sometime. It does NOT say all records are held by the Archivist. The law differentiates between personal documents and presidential documents the term open only applied to warrants for taking a person into custody... you can read the warrant here As you can...

In civil court trials often do not have juries, divorce cases for instance have no jury, there are no juries in traffic court.

Except for all the court cases.

Mike Pompeo got the same cold reception in 2018. I'm guessing this it has to do with the position and not the person.

I doubt it but it will be interesting to watch.

not really. Section 793(e) of the Espionage Act involves the retaining of and failure to return classified national defense information

Well until Trump they didn't have to do anything but ask. Unless you look at the espionage act.

Try reading the law. The president can take and do what ever he likes with personal records not presidential records. The Presidential Records Act establishes that presidential records automatically transfer into the legal custody of the Archivist as soon as the President leaves office. And...

if it was wiped clean how could they find classified material?

which can only be done in an actual trail

repeating a false claim wont magically make it true Again we can go over each trial if you like

What FBI Director James Comey said in a July 2016 statement that the FBI investigation "found no evidence that any of the additional work-related emails were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them."

And why would they? The FBI vide documented everything...including finding the classified documents in his bathroom. THe same files Trump publicaly claiemd multiple times did not exist. The Department of Justice has piles of documentation That case was first tried in Waukesha County Wisconsin...