Search results

Present it.

Well that is convenient. At that time Sigmund Freud wrote: "Homosexuality is assuredly no advantage, but it is nothing to be ashamed of, no vice, no degradation, it cannot be classified as an illness; we consider it to be a variation of the sexual function. But that is avoiding the issue...

Did you have to be taught to be straight? 50 years ago Psychiatrists how held that same opinion were asked, repeatedly, to show evidence to support this. They couldn't. no, you were just born that way. do you tell your gay friends that they are damaged? Why? And that is why legitimately...

well find me someone who is not born yet so I can ask them to self identify.

the gay agenda is just a lie

Because the library of congress is the storehouse for the congressional record. It was read into the congressional record missing the introductory paragraph. Is just another lie conservatives tell

Citizenship requires birth.

wrong again

but you are trying to claim that orientation is behavioral which precludes being apparent. and if someone comes out and says they are gay I'm sure you can believe him but you don't know if that man has ever had sex. You can't assume he has because there is no way to tell. There is every...

that was a rhetorical question. Obviously the "manifesto" was edited to remove that all important introduction because the congressman who read it into the congressional record wanted to lie about its nature and content.

You could have looks at the studies cited and found out just how rather than post this nonsense.

any evidence to back this up?

My dad has told me about the fundamentalists in the 1980's who tried to have the dictionary banned.

Several years ago some fundamentalist decided that Anne was a lesbian and as such children needed to be protected from her perversion. Since then the book has been one of the most challenged books libraries.

Or any book. Censorship is a conservative thing.

It's your own argument.

If you called any other minority deluded, sick and evil it would be correctly labeled as hate.

Why wasn't the introductory paragraph included? The paragraph the details how this is a satire on the laughable claims of the Christian right.

well present the agenda with evidence that it is legitimate. I won't hold my breath waiting for you

it sounds like you don't have any evidence, compelling or otherwise