Search results

what testing are you talking about?

and it still would have leaked

don't see anything about 120 years of preaching. But then why would Noah have to? if God was running around miracleing up all the stuff needed to make the ark why not just miracle up some better people?

nothing annoys me more then when my compost bin gives me coal

I guess the Spanish just never thought of sealing their galleons. and tar is made from coal....which could not have existed before the flood.

Its also against celibacy. why aren't you condemning them?

Orientatoin has nothing to do with action. Virgins and celibates all have an orientation

Using a disease to justify personal prejudice is morally bad. finding the fact that people suffer from disease amusing is morally bad and frankly disgusting.

I disagree with you.

These actually aren't big mysteries at all. Why not just provide the ark premade? they really aren't that baffled. :watching and waiting: if so they why bother with the ark at all? Seems like it would have been easier to just talk to the handful of wicked people and inspire them to be better.

facts are facts

Evidence? Evidence? On what planet?

how did you know?

Yes, pitch made from bituminous coal. But wait...there was no coal before the flood. Hmmmm

where?

Thank you for putting words into my mouth

All wooden boats leak whether under sail or sitting in a harbor. How much leakage is dependant on the size of the boat. THe bigger the boat the more it will leak.

I've spent years working with ex-ex-gays and survivors of conversion therapy and I am all to familiar with the creative wording of conversion and reparative therapy to mask the fact that people don't change their orientation.

Apparently it is possible.

Well now you seem to be saying that it's wrong to use the prevalence of a disease to justify an personal prejudice against a minority. So which is it? Is it wrong to use a disease to justify prejudice or is that morally acceptable?