Search results

OK then. Show us these terms in God's Word! I will not hold my breath.

You are totally twisting Scripture to support your error. That is probably why you refuse to quote the actual text. Revelation 20 is the beginning of the final recap in the book of Revelation and finishes at the second coming. You cannot see that recaps, that is why you do not understand...

Relax. I was talking about your last post.

These are invented terms that disagree with Scripture.

That is not true. You consistently show that you have an ignorance of Amillennialism. But you also have an ignorant of what you believe also. Premils do not hold to this. Why do passages describing the same event have to have exact same Greek word in them? That is ridiculous. Whatever subject...

What are you talking about? This is incoherent gibberish.

Revelation 3:10 reads: "Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep [Gr. tēreō] thee from [Gr. ek] the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth." Pretribulationists miss (or ignore) the fact that the promise being...

Ask yourself some simple questions and you will see how erroneous this is. Where is a rapture mentioned in Revelation 3:10? Where is a 7 yr trib mentioned in Revelation 3:10? Where is a 3rd coming mentioned in Revelation 3:10?

This nonsense is from Daniel B. Wallace. https://bible.org/article/note-revelation-310

I did. Read the text!

No. That is your invented theology. That is not what the Bible teaches. There are two peoples on this earth - saved and lost. The brethren are the elect. The redeemed (the brethren) care for each other, the religious unregenerate does not. That is what this narrative is teaching.

No. That is your invented theology. That is not what the Bible teaches. There are two peoples on this earth - saved and lost. The brethren are the elect. The redeemed (the brethren) care for each other, the religious unregenerate does not. That is what this narrative is teaching.

This is what false teaching produces.

True! Read any thread on Rev 20 and you will see that. They have no rebuttal for Amil. They have no corroboration for their view on Revelation 20.

Do you notice that they don't address any of our questions or arguments, they just sidetrack onto irrelevancies?

More avoidance and false accusations. Can you address my rebuttal above please?

This is how Premils typically understand/interpret all Scripture - by their flawed opinion of one single lone symbolic passage in the most figurative and obscure book in the Bible, 3 chapters before the end. Yea right! This is horrible hermeneutics.

Revelation 20 is the last parallel of seven in Revelation. Once you get to the end of Satan season you have the coming of the Lord and the general resurrection/judgment.

What? When did i force your censure?

The burden of proof is with you. You are making the false claim, without any evidence. What you are claiming is an illusion. I do not have to prove that leprechauns do not exist. They simply do not.