Search results

You obtain the blood by being buried with Christ through baptism in the name of Jesus. The blood has not covered the Earth, regardless of peoples situations. You have to get it specifically by obeying Peter per repent, and be baptized everyone of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission...

How can a person be regenerated when they are not baptized in the name of Jesus for the remission of sins?

Blood being shed, remission of sins, is by being baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Why would he command them to repent be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins and they could receive the promise of the Holy Ghost if they were already saved?

So when he promised them that they could receive the Holy Ghost after being baptized, in the name of Jesus for the remission of sins, they already had the Holy Ghost?

Oh, I see, this is how you Catholics think… Peter said this, but what he really means is this…. Lol.

I guess baptism in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins is all Greek to you.

Let Professor Truther teach you an English lesson. Re per our discussion means to redo. Baptism that was not in the name of Jesus Christ needs to be redone. Paul did this to the 12 in Acts chapter 19. All Catholics are not baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. You and your Catholic...

So you think it could’ve also been worded like this… Then Peter said to them repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of the son…? Jesus name could’ve easily been omitted to satisfy the Roman Catholic Church of the future?

All I am doing is obeying and propagating Acts 2:38. You are right about one thing, they are calling those that obey Peter per Pentecost, cultists etc. What a mess

The evidence is in. Most Christians refuse to obey Peter per Acts 2:38, when they asked, what shall I do? They fight it tooth and nail. The last thing they would do is get baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, much less get baptized at all.

Catholics must make horrible bankers because they use the titles of the individual instead of the name on a check. They are also horrible at math because they believe that one plus one plus one equals one. They would make horrible workers for Elon Musk. Trying to send up rockets.

So you are saying that you never use your personal name but only your title son? Well son? Is that correct?

I did read what you said. Re-baptism is in the name of Jesus Christ. It does not matter how you were baptized prior to that. Especially Catholics.

So are you saying that Peter was premature at telling people in the book of Acts to be baptized in the name of Jesus and should’ve wait until the book of Romans was written so we could skip Acts altogether like you guys do?

AI search engines are the word of God?

Trinitarians are the only people I’ve ever known that write their titles “son” on their checks instead of signing their name. Banks have to make special accommodations for them. It’s a form of DEI that is taking over the world. The gays call themselves he him her they, etc. and the Trinitarians...

In Acts chapter 19, the disciples of John were rebaptized in the name of Jesus. Down goes your paper tower.

Let’s face it, I’m stuck on a personal name and you’re stuck on a personal title of a name. Catholics think titles are as good as a name. Do you understand, son?

I see, you are saying that the command of being baptized in the name of the Lord is the equivalent of being baptized in the title son. Now that is really intelligent. Am I not correct, son?

Fake news. You were baptized in the titles like the rest of the Catholics. You didn’t even repent first. You have to be rebaptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of your sins.