Search results

The problem with Christendom as a whole is that they don’t believe that the Father was inside Jesus. They still don’t believe that the Fathers is inside Jesus. It doesn’t matter how much they read or quote Colossians 2:9, they don’t believe a word of it. They only believe that a portion of God...

Also, he said, the Father speaks through him.(….the words that I speak are not mine, but the Fathers…) Now, did he say that the Father speaks as Jesus or through Jesus?

He said that the father inside him was doing the works through him correct?

I agree. Now, what did he say in the immediate following verses?

Most of Christendom is pushing the incarnation of God as Jesus. They stripped Jesus of his individuality. And made him a flesha God.

BOL is fun. I like him. He reminds me of the Archie Bunker of the RCC. I smite him doctrinally, daily.

….anything to keep the name of Jesus out of it, huh?

If you understood Acts 2:38, you would baptize adults in the name of Jesus Christ. I guess you can understand it and you still disobey it. That puts you in hotter water.

The questions you’re asking are very important. The reason why that not all are healed is simple. We are in a pre-millennial, partial, dark glass experience. We are included into the future promise to the fathers per future national Israel when Jesus comes, save them all and heals all the...

The Bible says …. Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee. The incarnationist teaches… Thou art my Son; this day have I incarnated as thee.

You refuse to admit you are a Modalist. Modalism is a 2nd century heresy that went nowhere. It was refuted as early as 325 A.D. At the council of Nicaea, that proved the Church has always been trinitarian. You reject that too. A modalist is someone who believes that God became a man. Even...

@Jude said this… Peter wasn't baptizing anyone when he said this. So he wasn't violating Matthew 28:19 the way you do. Jude, you said Peter violated Jesus’s command. When Jesus gave Peter the keys in Matthew 16, was Peter unqualified and did Jesus make a mistake there too?

Did Peter violate Matthew 28:19 or did he fulfill it when he commanded sinners to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of their sins and not mentioning Father or Holy Ghost in water baptism? Did any of the disciples in the book of Acts violate Matthew 28:19 since not a...

Then why don’t you baptize in the actual name of the father, and of the son, and of the Holy Ghost? Why don’t you say their names? Don’t you get what you guys are doing? You’re just repeating Jesus like a parrot instead of doing what he commanded you to do.

This is just easy. All of this thinking and rethinking and rethinking is causing people to not be baptized in the name of Jesus. Peter said to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins. That is how we get remission of sins. There should be no argument there at all. The...

I think the tithe doctrine is the greatest stumbling block that the churches have put in the path of sinners. People that are poor that attempt to be saved may decline and do decline. When I met with the pastor to be baptized in 1979. He told me I had to agree to tithing. I was making minimum...

The disciples that baptized by immersion in the name of Jesus in the book of Acts were water heretics. Great, just great.

No, you got that all wrong, a protestant is defined as someone who protests Peter per Acts 2:38. Your RCC church is the mother of all protestants. You are the very first organization to protest Acts 2:38 and end it. The rest of your protestant daughters follow you like lemmings. Get that right.

You cannot baptize in the name of Jesus without saying the name of Jesus. You can’t do any works or deeds in the name of Jesus, without saying the name of Jesus.

Blah blah blah blah blah. The fact is, Jesus inherited his name from his Father. You have no idea how inheritance is obtained and if it belong to somebody prior. You guys are so messed up it is pathetic. I saw the mass Greek come out and the mass commentary trying to debunk Hebrews chapter 1...