Search results

The precise identity of the “angel of the Lord” is not given in the Bible. However, there are many important “clues” to his identity. There are Old and New Testament references to “angels of the Lord,” “an angel of the Lord,” and “theangel of the Lord.” It seems when the definite article “the”...

https://www.gotquestions.org/angel-of-the-Lord.html

It doesn't trouble me at all Angel means messenger so this is the messenger of the Lord

Reading the Old Testament it's clear that The Angel of the Lord is exceptional ( not AN Angel of the Lord) He spoke from the burning bush but a few verses later his words are attributed to God himself. This is no ordinary angel and some believe he is the pre-incarnate Jesus himself

https://www.gotquestions.org/incarnation-of-Christ.html

Baptists do believe in the Trinity, at least all the Baptist Churches I have attended here in the south

No man has seen the father except Jesus

It comes with a link

Yes, your other resource is copy and paste without giving credit to the source

God can do whatever he chooses to do.

Amazing that you can have that much information and still be wrong

https://www.bereanpatriot.com/is-jesus-god-or-merely-a-god-unitarianism-vs-trinity/

They’re not my Lord, Jesus is

When the text obviously counters the post being responded to there is no need for commentary

Copied and pasted without crediting the source. Your rebuttals are plagiarism. How embarrassing https://www.antipas.org/books/trinity/trinity1.html

Someone is claiming that he is correct based on the fact that we don't argue with him enough. I just let the posts speak for themselves

It was like this when I first joined. Someone told me "Welcome to Cultianity Board "

Which seminary did you graduate from? What are your qualifications to be teaching? Since I know you'll ask, I graduated from Andersonville Theological Seminary

They're not difficult to me, I don't need your explanation