Search results

Is this your excuse to hide in your bunker from helping those under the wrath of God during the GT?

I definitely don't understand your idea of the saints being decimated by the wrath of God along with the sinners during the GT.

You saw it. It's too late. Now you know..... Matt 24... 40 Then shall two be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left. 41 Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left.... 1 Thes 4-5... 17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be...

As long as I don't call my Bible a metaphor like you do....

Enoch(righteous) taken up before wrath, Noah(righteous) taken up before wrath, Lot(righteous) taken out before wrath... Davy says Church taken AFTER wrath....LOL.

Matt 24 says saints taken, then a thief, then a drunken servant... 1 Thes 4-5 says saints taken, then a thief, then a drunken servant.... Just ignore this fact and blow it off as a councidence. You see it...too late.

The verse(27 in red) is speaking of the trib saints that survive into the Millennial reign and those already in heaven at the marriage supper of Rev 19... All in Heaven... 6 And I heard as it were the voice of a great multitude, and as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of mighty...

All I told you is I use scripture and you use commentary to create doctrine. This is why the RCC flipped out against Luther. He said "sola scriptura" and the RCC said "mucho commentaria". You are from the same RCC mold.

The disconnect with the RCC is simple. They think the name of the son per Matt 28:19 is "son". They call Jesus, "son". Jesus is their son. Ma ry is their queen mother.

I said... You said... Ah, magical incantations! .... Bite your tongue.

The Baptists call the name of Jesus a "magical formula". How dare they. All because they refuse to be baptized in Jesus name. Some have said it is white magic to say the name of Jesus during baptism. The RCC would not even say that. The Baptists are more sacriligious than the RCC. Think...

Believing is the qualifier to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. If a person does not believe they should not be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ.

I totally agree.

You missed it again Catholic, the problem you have is you were baptized wrong and need to be baptized just like the 12 men in Acts chapter 19. You refuse. You think being baptized as a baby is going to do the trick. Wow. What a sham.

Again, the Roman Catholic Church is all about commentary. I had a debate with a priest in his office and there were several people there to witness it. I brought my Bible alone and he brought an arm full of books and dropped them on the table to try to counter my Bible. You are doing the same thing.

Wow, you think the name of Jesus being spoken is magic. Is that what you would’ve said to Peter when he spoke the name of Jesus to heal the lame man in Acts chapter 3?

To baptize in the name of the son, you have to say the name of Jesus. The Roman Catholic Church forbid it. They have to also allow a person to repent. They bypass repentance and baptize infants. Everything about it is wrong.

Those that were baptized in John’s baptism had to be re-baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Those that are baptized in the Roman Catholic Church baptism have to also likewise be rebaptized in the name of Jesus Christ.

Water must be used by immersion, and the name of Jesus must be spoken for us to be buried with Christ and find remission of sins. The best and proper way to baptize is to say, I baptize you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of your sins. Then you immerse them. Can’t go wrong.

Well, you should say in the name of the father son Holy Ghost, then baptize them in the name of Jesus. Now you just gotta switch it into forward instead of reverse.