Search results

The gentiles received the Holy Ghost in order to lead them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of their sins, thus that is why Peter commanded it and not suggested it. You guys completely omit it. I don’t know what to think of you guys.

The thief on the cross was an old Testament situation. Water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ did not begin until Pentecost. The thief on the cross was prior to that. Now, when it comes to the old testament, we have an altar sacrifice. Jesus died and we die or repent. The priest would...

You don’t say the name of Jesus over your baptismal candidate so you do not baptize in the name of Jesus Christ. You have utterly failed as a Roman Catholic. You do not belong to the church of 3000 at Pentecost.

Of course, water is only water unless you immerse someone saying the name of Jesus. At that point, you are buried with Jesus in baptism. You need to learn that. If you have not been baptized in the name of Jesus, your dead and don’t know it. You are like a chicken with his head cut off still...

Water baptism buries us with Jesus Christ. When we are baptized in the name of Jesus, we are baptized into his death. The Holy Spirit does not do that. What you’re doing is looking at Rome and you think forward instead of backward. You think that Rome started baptizing in the name of Jesus by...

Water baptism gives you a clean conscience before God. It is also known as the remission of sins. Although it always, and Only was done in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins.

So Acts 2:38 is law and not grace?

No, the second chapter of Acts. That was 2000 years ago. They always and Only baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Oneness religion and church of Christ has nothing to do with it.

They had previously received the gift of the Holy Ghost and then were commanded to be baptized in the name of Jesus in water. How can you not see that?

The work of the cross is fulfilled in water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ.

Then Peter said to them repent and be baptized by the Holy Ghost and you shall receive the Holy Ghost?

Compiling the scriptures together into a volume is a far cry from writing down every little commentary somebody has an opinion about. Everybody knows you have scripture truth and you have fake news. Commentary is not scripture. You guys treat it like it is.

It is the Catholic Church that rose up to attempt to wipe out water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins. They are the mother of all the protestant churches that omit baptism in the name of Jesus Christ.

Water baptism in the name of Jesus is a carryover from the book of Acts chapter 2 when the 3000 obeyed Peter and we’re baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of their sins. Modernists are disobeying Peter and talking people out of their salvation by not being baptized in the name...

So in Peter commanded the gentiles to be baptized in the name of the Lord, they said no?

I would not rely on authenticity of any early church, fathers writings, or extra biblical commentary. This is just a Catholic trick.

Great question. After being baptized in the name of Jesus Christ, we are saved from future sins. This means our spirit is saved, but our nature or our flesh is not saved. Romans 7 clearly explains this stuff.

God can forgive a human being of their sins in a one time event or whatever he wants to do. But to find remission of sins, which is a clean slate before God and be officially saved, one must be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of their sins. Even though they have a sinful...

Yes. I am.

Baptism in the name of Jesus Christ remits sins, which you forbid.