Search results

That was not a mistake of doctrine, but a simple senior moment. I intended to write, "and did not resurrect the first Sunday that falls on or after the vernal equinox".

I didn't say they were destroyed because they rejected Yeshua. I simply identified that wicked generation as the one that rejected Yeshua. Yeshua is not spoken of until verse 7. Prior to that the subject is the "logos" which was YHWH's spoken words and thoughts, NOT the Son. Yeshua did not have...

He fulfilled the sacrifices once with his death, but the effects of his sacrifice is ongoing. The sacrificial death of Yeshua is effective for believers. There will be many unbelievers living during the Millennium that do not have him as their sacrifice. Perhaps Ezekiel's future sacrifices will...

This is the record we have of what Paul wrote; Col2:17 which are a shadow of things to come; ‹17› ἅ ἐστιν σκιὰ τῶν µελλόντων, 17 ha estin skia ton mellonton, What you have given us is one of the worst cases I have ever seen of adding your own words to the text.

The Biblical symbolism of trumpets is fulfilled on Yom Teruah when the 7 trumpets of Revelation signaling YHWH's war with the wicked begins the Day of YHWH. The Jubilee is associated with the resurrection and is announced by the Jubilee trumpet sounding. In both of these passages Paul is using...

Then what did he say in Colossians 2:17?

Yeshua fulfilled the sacrifices of those days, but not everything that pertains to them. The Jubilee trumpet is yet to be blown and Yeshua's blood as the Passover Lamb provides ongoing protection from death. You neglect the words "to come". You say "were" and Paul says "are" "to come". Are...

I'm not allowed to quote an OT passage that refers to the New Covenant? Or is it just tat you do not like what it says about the NC because it is contrary to what you have been indoctrinated to believe? Yes, you have quoted Paul, but out of context. The same way you misunderstand Paul, you have...

And he spoke of the feasts as shadows of future things. You would have a case if Paul included sacrifices in his list of unfulfilled shadows, but he didn't because they were fulfilled. The believers were observing Passover, but I doubt they were killing a Passover lamb. All the holy days are...

This passage refers to the relationship the holy, just, good, and spiritual law has to the carnal man living under the Old Covenant (Romans 7:14). His mind delights in the Law of YHWH (Romans 7:22), but his flesh wars against the Law of YHWH (Romans 7:23; 8:7). The solution? Turn the carnal man...

Using a sukkah as a temporary dwelling by farmers during harvesting is nowhere found in Scripture. The closest thing to it would be Jacob's sukkah that he built for his animals. Perhaps farmers did use sukkot during harvest, but since that is not mentioned in Scripture, I don't see how it can be...

Neither were the KJV translators.

The Tabernacles were built during the wilderness journey when they had no harvest. What I am saying is that the literal agricultural harvest in Israel is finished prior to the feast of Tabernacles being celebrated. Once the harvest was completed, then they celebrated the feast by giving thanks...

Paul was definitely pro-law and against the misuse of it. We do not keep the law to give life or to be justified or to be saved or to receive the Spirit. We keep it because we love YHWH and He commanded us to keep it. It is so valuable, that He wrote it on our hearts and minds under the New...

Easter sometimes coincides with Passover and it is sometimes an entire month off. I have a MAJOR accusation against the KJV as well. That is, their blatant, man made substitution of "the LORD" in place of the Tetragrammaton throughout the OT.

Paul said the feasts "are shadows of things to come". Therefore, when Paul wrote that the feasts had not been fulfilled yet. The Sabbath, Passover, and the Feast of Unleavened Bread all existed prior to the Old Covenant, yet you include them as having passed away. No, that is what you are...

And I showed you that "pascha" in Greek means "Passover", not "Easter" throughout the Septuagint and the NT. I could care less what Latin, French, or any other language means.

I don't see any connection. Where in the writings concerning the Day of Atonement do you see the sanctification of the bride? The bride was sanctified long before Revelation 19 (1 Corinthians 1:2; 6:11, etc.) The agricultural harvest in Israel was complete before Tabernacles. So the harvest of...

Fine. If you want to read into his words the thought of salvation, whatever. The fact remains that Easter and Passover refer to two different days and therefore pascha cannot possibly be translated "Easter".

Do you mean in relation to the doctrine of eternal security? I see no connection.