Search results

Oh, how I love Jesus, Oh, how I love Jesus, Oh, how I love Jesus, Because He first loved me! :hearteyes: :hearteyes: :hearteyes: .

Notice that the very pointed implication by Paul here is that the non-carnal, spiritual mind not only can be, but is subject to the law of God. And there's no mistaking what he means by "the law of God" because he specifically refers to one of its precepts in chapter 7, verse 7—and it ain't...

Thanks so much for the reminder, Sis! You're right on time with it, too! I've been ailing some and haven't made it to meeting the past few, when I probably could have managed well enough. :hearteyes: .

Again, not a word about what Christ is doing in the most holy place because you don't know and you don't care, because if you did, you might have to change your broken-record tune. .

Drafted up a day or so ago: The fact that you don't know the whole story doesn't mean that anyone's changing theirs. There's sound prophetic interpretation that explains papal Rome's dual rise and fall. The elephant in the room, at this point, is your apparent effort to get us to ignore the...

Drafted up a day or so ago: You admonish? Because resting and worshipping on God's benevolent, scientifically-observed, circaseptan biorhythmic schedule is such bitter bondage? Along with abstaining from other things that are so liberating like murder, adultery, larceny, idolatry, parental...

You're absolutely right. The Bible doesn't say anything about Jesus NOT moving from the holy place to the most holy place in 1844. You can quit pretending you know what you're talking about anytime now. .

About which you know absolutely nothing and, therefore, have no basis for criticism. All you know is that we claim something happened in 1844, but you have no idea what that thing is. You just drop the term "Investigative Judgment" and bolt. Hang around and tell us all about it, Amigo. I've...

By the way, which Adventists here are quoting Mrs. White rather than Scripture to support their beliefs? NONE—that's which ones. .

You've obviously never been involved in foreign mission work. People have to be instructed. I once spent 6 weeks in Bolivia trying to teach hungry people that it is wrong to steal food and, consequently, other things. If the heart can be deceived to believe it's okay to steal necessities...

Praise the LORD!! God bless you, Sis! My wife just loves those mock scallops. We cut them in half longways and bread and oven-fry them, then dip them in cocktail sauce. There pretty yummy! .

And I'm sure that mind reading and false accusations will help you reach no one for Christ. If you don't care if the Adventists you presume are deceived are without Christ, then you're doing precisely the appropriate thing. In the meantime, we'll be here letting whomever might be interested...

"Many days"="1000 years" .

Or, we could simply just go to Daniel 2 (parallel to Daniel 7), verse 28, which says: Daniel 2:28 KJV — But there is a God in heaven that revealeth secrets, and maketh known to the king Nebuchadnezzar what shall be in the latter days. Thy dream, and the visions of thy head upon thy bed, are...

I think it's interesting to note the way that the call to "Brethren in Christ" with no quotation or qualification of any kind suggests that a "Brother in Christ" might be just anyone reading who isn't an Adventist. Neither Jew nor Greek...? .

The Bible says we can only live by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God—not just any word. I can't do the mental gymnastics you're doing here, Zig. I can't take what God has plainly said and play hopscotch with it until I've turned it into something else entirely that conforms to...

I wonder what exactly makes the "STUDY LINK" "REAL." I looked over the front page list and some of the items are questionable just from the title but, really, isn't it convenient that we now have an Internet we can use to just point people to canned slander about people we don't even know, but...

You have broken the ironimeter. This statement itself is, in fact, an exquisitely bonafide straw man argument. .

What's the point in replying to someone who pretends that certain things aren't even being said, when they actually are, and that things are being said when they actually aren't? Aside from being a patently false teacher, you're literally denying the reality that any passerby can plainly see...

You've made clear in the past your views on Adventist eschatology, Jay, so I wouldn't care to joust buy if you're really interested, the spelling out part of this video begins at roughly 27 minutes in: (Actually, more like 35 minutes in) :hearteyes: .