Search results

There are two faults in your thinking. 1. The church will not be able to take the "charagma" (imprint, tattoo) of the beast because we will be in heaven before the command to take the mark is issued. 2. It doesn't matter which day the church woeships on., The Sabbath was given as a sign...

Ah yes. The Old covenant "allegorical reinterpretation retranslation"ploy. Nothing in Acts 2 shows that Daivids throne in heaven. for it is on earth and Jesus will sit on it during the Millennial kingdom. As for Heb. 1-- Wrong again, the promise was made to the whole nation of Israel, nor...

Then as you are so insistent in the Phrae "eternal covenant". then please show me in history and Scripture that the Abrahamic, Davidic and Land covenant which are eternal that God made with Israel are in effect also! Well if you want to see Bro. Arnold reiterate those- contact HIm. I am an ot...

Then why are you unable to show me those provisions of the covenant as spelled out in Jer. 31 in history. The land covenant God made with Israel is eternally in effect, yet they have not experienced the provisions of the covenant yet.

Of course not! but it can be a very painful experience while it is going on. I think of our brethren show were dipped in wax and then lit as tiki torches for Neros Garden parties. they knew their relationship and destiny were secure but still experienced untold pain until they went home.

And you seem terrified to answer a simple question that you know what it is asking.

meaning that exact number and bowing th eknee to the specific Baal? Yes it is not true. But God has always had a remnant of faith ful Israelites some times far more than 7000 and wouldn't surprise if there were fewer than 7000 at times and the false gods they did not bow to have gone by...

And yes I do, I sat under the full teaching, not just a summation in the manuscript. But I think your problem lies in the fact that some form of replacement theology have taken over your biblical thinking so it has caused for a faulty hermeneutic. As you are willing to agree with Dr...

Paul also wrote that there is neither bond nor free, and yet spoke alot to servants to be subject to their masters. Is he a hypocrite? He also said there is no difference between male and female and yest wrote about wives submitting to their husbands as their head just as Jesus is the head of...

Well in the most broadest definition ofapply, I would agree with you. But teh new covenant was made between god and Israel. We gentiles were not in the desert nor did our fathers break the old covenant. this is also declared in Heb8 and rom. 11. I do not allow one to take Scripture to...

Just to give you all an update. He has been breathing on his own and finally removed the breathing tube that was helping him because he is breathing strongly. He has opened his eys, and on request Squeezed his wifes hand and wiggles his toes. Do not know if any more surgery are gong to ber...

Didn't say be afraid I said the judgments are horrendous and they are! Some will even affect the tribulation saints, and I do not think they will be dancinf for joy

YOu are not stupid so I don't buy that answer. Google it and you can learn something! then answer the Question. I will answer you after you respond to this question.

So show how all the provisions of the covenant as stated in Jer. 31 are iin effect. I do not disagree that Gentiles are bveneficiaries of the covenant, but we are unnatural branches grafted on to the vine of Jewish blessing because of grace! Then just show that the provisions as stated in Jer...

From Page 35: "It is an unconditional covenant involving god and both houses of Israel........It should be noted it is not made with the church." "Third, it promises the national regeneration of Israel.(Jer.33:31, Is. 59:21) . The key aspect of this entire covenant is the blessing of...

It will have to be decided by SCOTUS. the question is does this amendment apply to people who are here illegally and does that felony allow children to be citizens under teh 14th amendment. The context of the amendment was far different than the question of illegal immigrants. But slaves...

Well I do, But what do you think it is saying.

I didn't. But because you redefine words you cannot see that I agree with Him. Teh church has a connection to the New Covenant as He said, but we are not part of the New Covenant as He also said. Remember He said the New covenant is a Covenant between God and Israel. why do you ignore this?

And keeping that in its proper context and not ripping it out of context. Isaac gave brth to Jacob (Israel) and Esau- who is the child of th eflesh. Spiritualizing a verse doesn't make the reinterpretation correct. And yes An Israelite who gets saved is spiritual Israel. But that is not what...