Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. D

    The Second Death Destroys Man's False Amill Theory

    Somehow I think your point likely has to do with a thread I started sometime ago involving the NHNE and the the thousand years being the first thousand years of the never ending NHNE.
  2. D

    SATAN, NOT BOUND YET

    How does the following help Amil? 1 Peter 5:8 Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour: 9 Whom resist stedfast in the faith, knowing that the same afflictions are accomplished in your brethren that are in the world...
  3. D

    PAROUSIA – Jesus’ Second COMING or PRESENCE?

    Doesn't Revelation 19 tell us when that Wicked is revealed? If Revelation 19 involves Christ's bodily second coming like many of us tend to believe, and that 2 Thessalonians 2:8 is pertaining to Revelation 19:21, how then can that Wicked already be revealed if 2nd 2nd coming has to happen first...
  4. D

    The Second Death Destroys Man's False Amill Theory

    Too bad Jesus doesn't claim that as well, in John 12:48, for instance. Amils then believe eternity has a last day? Talk about something worthy of a LOL. As if eternity, IOW, outside of time, involves days, let alone a last day. As if eternity can somehow end rather than continue forever. John...
  5. D

    PAROUSIA – Jesus’ Second COMING or PRESENCE?

    I don't understand what you are arguing in the OP? It seems to me, in order for Christ to come, it obviously involves His presence. His literal bodily presence. Matthew 24:27 For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming(parousia) of the...
  6. D

    PAROUSIA – Jesus’ Second COMING or PRESENCE?

    Obviously, they are. All one has to do is look up the Greek word used for 'that wicked' and it is crystal clear that that same Greek word is never applied to satan. anomos an'-om-os from a - a 1 (as a negative particle) and nomoV - nomos 3551; lawless, i.e. (negatively) not subject to (the...
  7. D

    A discussion I just had recently with Chatgpt involving Daniel 7.

    If the context per verses 9-11 involve Revelation 19:20, and assuming Amil is the correct view, though I disagree it is, that would make verses 9-11 be right before 1 Corinthians 15:28 is fulfilled. Per a context like that no one would care what happened to the rest of the beasts in history...
  8. D

    A discussion I just had recently with Chatgpt involving Daniel 7.

    No, I did not know that. I'm that stupid, that I think chagpt is a Bible scholar. Every opportunity that you can, you thrive on insulting my intelligence. You just can't seem to resist, as if I am so stupid that I don't even have a clue what chagpt is. I'm willing to bet I know far far more...
  9. D

    Born again believers are NOT appointed to God's wrath ( the great tribulation )

    For example. Don't know how long you have been reading the Bible, but however long it's been, not one single time have you ever compared Revelation 6 and the 6th seal with that of Matthew 24:29? How many times should we assume the stars fall from heaven, in any sense? Both accounts involve that...
  10. D

    Miscellaneous observations on the Pre Trib Rapture

    If you are going to use this as an argument, you then need to provide that statement in question and a link to it so we can see that statement in context.
  11. D

    Born again believers are NOT appointed to God's wrath ( the great tribulation )

    Jesus could be meaning that spiritually, meaning He is warning about falling away, and that He is using first century Jewish language to make His point. After all, if the AOD is involving 2 Thessalonians 2:4 and the 42 month reign of the beast like I take it be involving, it's not like none of...
  12. D

    Born again believers are NOT appointed to God's wrath ( the great tribulation )

    Speaking for myself I have zero dispute with any of this. This describes you to a T and that I truly wish I could be more like you in that regard. I probably could be if we were having these conversations orally face to face. I think I have told you in that past that when I type I only using...
  13. D

    A discussion I just had recently with Chatgpt involving Daniel 7.

    Here's something else I recently gave to Chatgpt to chew on. I said the following below, this being in regards to that some interpreters interpreting Matthew 24:21 as a local event already fulfilled 2000 years ago then these same interpreters interpreting Daniel 12:1 as a future event, but not...
  14. D

    Born again believers are NOT appointed to God's wrath ( the great tribulation )

    That passage supports what happened in the first century leading up to 70 AD. Matthew 24:15-21 does not support that. And the reason why is because Daniel 12:1-2 does not support that. A lot of interpreters come to conclusions without actually thinking through it first. And then when you try...
  15. D

    Born again believers are NOT appointed to God's wrath ( the great tribulation )

    Except we do know when it starts and ends. It begins with the AOD. It ends with the beginning of the day of the Lord. Some interpreters insist the AOD was involving the 2nd temple before it was destroyed, except they all can't agree with each other what that AOD looked like, which then raises a...
  16. D

    Was Jerusalem "Babylon the Great" 2,000 years ago?

    I wish I could borrow your mind sometime, because you bring up some of the most interesting questions that never cross my mind. You indeed think outside of the box, something I like to do as well, except I tend to think you might be better at it than I think I am. To answer your question, was...
  17. D

    Was Jerusalem "Babylon the Great" 2,000 years ago?

    Convincing post about what? Since when is anyone in Babylon repentant? Since when was David not repentant? To be in Babylon, for one thing, means to never be repentant. David, while responsible for Uriah’s death, was still aligned with God’s purposes, unlike those who align themselves with...
  18. D

    Was Jerusalem "Babylon the Great" 2,000 years ago?

    You have to keep in mind Babylon is portrayed as unrepentant, defiant, and continuously engaged in the shedding of innocent blood. Does that fit David throughout his life? No. He was repentant and God eventually forgave him. But he had consequences for his actions to pay in the meantime, such as...
  19. D

    The Second Death Destroys Man's False Amill Theory

    When it comes to reading Matthew 25:31-47, do you perhaps have reading comprehension or something? Can you not see that the goats all answer Jesus in the same manner? Let's take Cain for example. Clearly he would be among the lost. Matthew 25:44 Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord...
  20. D

    Born again believers are NOT appointed to God's wrath ( the great tribulation )

    You are the type to have quick answers for everything. Which then tells me you don't even take the time to consider something first. You have your theology all mapped out apparently, nothing to rethink, nothing to revise. That's not the way my mind operates. Sometimes we need to stand back for a...