Search results

I already showed Doug where Paul, in the last part of Acts preached the "gospel of the kingdom" About all we can do is shake our heads in disbelief of the bogus hyperpauline baloney. Here they are with a false gospel screaming from their soapbox nobody but them knows the gospel Oh.....and it...

Because you somehow think Peter did not understand salvation. Your doctrine teaches that Jesus was also confused about his mission.

You gospel believes He died as plan b. .....that he actually failed in his diluted first mission to the Jews to bring in " the kingdom" Which is the rotten fruit of the hyperpaulines.

The gospel is Salvation for all willing to accept Jesus. In one word the gospel is Jesus. Not Paul. Paul is not the gospel. Not a string of sentences. Not your doctrine. Not 3 magic words. Not one magic word But you actually believe Jesus, John and Peter were confused and only Paul had truth.

You can believe anything you want. Since only Paul is valid, and you want to fib about nobody else understanding the gospel, save Paul, I would say you have created your own little Pauline paradise.

Were you looking in a mirror when you said that????? I have forced you over and over to Go against the bible. Pssst...grace teaching is from Genesis to revelation. ( pssst...God has only one remedy for sin...INNOCENT BLOOD) Because you center in Paul you can not understand God's purpose and...

No doubt if Peter used Paul's exact wording we would all say it is plagureism. But you see Peter's wording making him irrelevant. In no way is Peter preaching a different gospel. By having 4 separate gospels, does it mean only one is correct? That is what you are doing. Especially since you...

IOW You are busted and can not wiggle out of your false doctrine. You now got a different doctrine????? Look, I sat under this Pauline mess . I know your teachers. (Less feldick Robert breaker. The book "greens letters") But I know my bible . I know YOUR doctrine that is what gets you busted

Just look at all the threads that Doug has formulated in this form. they all have the same silly false assumptions that we can only trust Paul, and that paul is the only true apostle and that Jesus Peter James and John, we're all confused. What this guy Doug is spreading. It's just pure contention

Maybe since he did baptize believers he should have consulted the hyper Pauline workbook that has been fashioned, and straightened himself out for such a haneous act of heresy. I guess he found out later that baptism was heresy???????

QUOTE: ""Clearly there is more than one gospel. Paul did not preach the gospel of the kingdom as Jesus and the twelve did. The gospel of the kingdom will be preached again in the tribulation."" QUOTE: " Paul never preach the kingdom" PAUL PREACHED THE KINGDOM. NO BOGEY MAN THERE AT ALL...

You made the statement that only Paul preached true salvation. It is YOUR DOCTRINE that FALSELY claims the Apostles AND JESUS preached a DIFFERENT gospel than Paul. YOU AND THAT HYPERPAULINE DOCTRINE that you obsess over MAKES THAT CLAIM like a gun slinger pulling a six gun. Your deal is...

Paul preached many things. Not the cross only. But Paul's gospel was not the cross. The Cross saves nobody, nor can it. Amoung what Paul preached, was the kingdom

The only warning I see in the Bible against 2 gospels is Paul cursing anyone bringing a different gospel. ( you know ...how Jesus and Peter supposedly gave us a perverted gospel) Can Hyperpaulines wiggle out of that?

You need to ask yourselves. What is the end game of this paul only heresy? What is the destination? What is the fruut of it? It is a complete nothingburger, There is no profound life-changing anything about it. It is what is written in the word " that wanting their ears tickled, they heap...

This is all parroting the hyperpauines books Feldick Breaker Greens letters. Bogus.totally hands down bogus heresy. They want you to believe that Jesus was confused about his mission and Paul was inspired by a different holy spirit than Peter James John and Jesus himself.

1 cor 1 14 I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius; 15 Lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name. 16 And I baptized also the household of Stephanas: besides, I know not whether I baptized any other. Psssst...the issue is baptism in Jesus name, not some...

If Peter James John andJesus preached a different gospel, than Paul, and that preaching was under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, then which holy spirit was paul under? Because inadvertently the hyperpallines have established that there's two holy spirits giving two separate messages.

Yep. A no brainer. But there is some bizarre need to pervert the bible. I just shake my head. It is heresy to say only Paul understood salvation, and Jesus himself was confused.

Quote "Jesus Christ came as a minister to Israel to fulfill the promises of God to Israel, bring in the kingdom of heaven to earth, and establish Israel as that light to the nations." Wow. Pure heresy. Ever read jn 3:16?????? JTB even announced Jesus entry to ministry as a sacrificial Lamb...