Search results

Little do you realize, as well as most others here, "the abomination that MAKETH desolate" has already happened long ago through the actions of Antiochus lV Epiphanes, being the type, and then again by someone else, but in anti-type.

Could you point out the number of each of the three segments, or is it just random since creation? Otherwise, I am not following your line of thinking.

You are stuck on the "time of the end", when the gospel will have been preached to all the world. But, you did not notice that if Jesus DIDN'T come in the flesh, as the Lamb of God for our salvation, in the time that He did, "the end of the world", by God the Father, would have been right then...

Yes! "the time of the end" was the END OF the OC, the "Age of Indignation". The word "covenant" is synonymous with the word "contract". When an old contract fails, or comes to the end of it's PURPOSE, between two parties (in this case, God and man), a NEW contract must be installed. God did do...

Amen!! Please see my post #407

Ok, yes I do agree with the way you are looking at the 2300 literal DAY prophecy. If you are seeing it in typology (type and antitype), That is exactly how we are to move forward with that past historical event of the 2300 days. God's whole point of the 2300 Day prophecy is to show that after...

I'm not doing anything. Through me, it's the Lord trying to get people's attention on a serious matter. Though you may not understand, the words that rustle you, are given to me of the Lord, because He wants us all to "Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees" of our day!! "On any biblical topic...

Say what you will about the interpretation of Dan. 7:8, that the Lord has revealed to me, and others I'm sure, because it is entirely based on scripture and taught by the Holy Spirit within me. 1 John 2 [27] But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any...

On such a note, I am not shocked** at your unwillingness to answer my question about the 3 horns that were "plucked up by the roots". Since you have provided no sturdy answer, that is worthy to interpret Dan. 7:8, it's only reasonable to conclude that the truth can and will stand by itself. [8]...

First and foremost the Hebrew words for 2300 days are very clear, being that of literal days and not years. That is the very first reason for interpretation. Dan. 8:4, 12:11-12. In the time of Daniel's visions of 525 BC, the 4th beast was then in its beginning as the Roman Republic, which...

My apologies if you have been offended. It was not my intention for it to be an insult. I was just relating to the difficulty in my mind attempting to deliver it, realizing that it might be confusing to all who read it. Earburner

Yes, thank you for the correction. My reference is post #365. I have corrected that error. I understand how it is that others are attempting to read the 2300 Day prophecy as being years. However, I cannot go against the Hebrew written words, that clearly and emphatically inform us that we are...

I guess we are at a stalemate. The 2300 days in the Strongs Hebrew: H6152 Dan. 8:14 ערב ‛ereb eh'-reb From H6150; dusk KJV Usage: + day, even (-ing, tide), night. H3117 in Daniel12:11-12. יום yôm yome From an unused root meaning to be hot; a day (as the warm hours), whether literally (from...

So, you also cannot answer my question in post #372: Edit #365. "Now, can you venture to name the beast with the other two horns, that were also plucked up, and was a world ruler in their time, before [prior to] A4E rose to power?" Please give it a try. Thanks.

You are welcome. "Ok and thanks", but you don't have an answer to my question? Post #372: Edit #365 Now, can you venture to name the beast with the other two horns, that were also plucked up, and was a world ruler in their time, before [prior to] A4E rose to power? Please give it a try. Thanks.

Ok. Let's play a little word game. Let's reverse that concept, and play it out. Be aware, in your mind, it might be difficult for you to carry through with it. Instead of using the word anti-christ, let's reverse the term to say anti-satan. So, if I use the term that spirit of anti-satan, who...

Actually, the word "the" can be used in both the singular and the plural. However, the word "that" is always used in the singular: "that spirit of antichrist".

As I have repeatedly shown, there was and is only one little horn, and AE was it. In the KJV there is nothing in Dan. 7 and 8 saying otherwise. Furthermore, the recorded history of the Jews is accurately accounted for in 1&2 Maccabees, and can be easily seen through Dan. chs. 7, 8, 11 and 12...

Well of course, it is satan, "the lawless ONE", the very spirit of antichrist, who infects many..

No! According to the KJV, there are no words that say "THE" Antichrist. Can I read it in the Greek to be "the lawless one"? YES, Indeed I can, but now we are talking about that fallen "ministering spirit", who is "that spirit of antichrist" who infects MANY men with the idea that Christ has not...