Search results

While I don’t agree with JW’s (like Robert Gwin), I do believe this name of God is valid in the Bible. I know that probably goes against everything you want to be true, but it is the truth (Nonetheless). Check out this article here: https://brandplucked.webs.com/jehovah.htm

*Big hug to you in the Lord* May the Lord Jesus Christ and His good ways always shine abundantly to you.

It does not seem like we are going to agree on this topic, sister. We can agree to disagree in love. May the Lord Jesus Christ bless you beyond all measure.

So you don’t have a problem with this symbol also being used by those who are into Witchcraft, the New Age, and the Buddha religion? 1 Thessalonians 5:22 says, “Abstain from all appearance of evil.” Even if the symbol was innocent, why associate with a symbol that is used by the dark arts and...

I do not mean to offend. We all grow in the knowledge of God’s Word. I am also not saying that a believer is going to hell if they used this symbol in ignorance. I just would feel extremely uneasy of using it after knowing the truth that I do. We are called to be holy and separate from the...

I understand that was not the reason the logo was used. I would say that many Christians are not aware that it is also used by the New Age, witches, and those who are into the Buddha religion. But I believe Christians are to be holy and separate from the world and it’s dark ways. But again, I...

Praise be unto the Lord for your family, Dan. You guys look really happy. My wife and I have a little one an we are currently training for when they grow up in a few years by watching Supernanny together on YouTube. Very informative program if you have not seen it. But it looks like your kids...

Today, all Modern Bibles use the Nestle and Aland New Testament Greek Critical Text, but even this is proven to be based primarily on the 1881 Westcott and Hort text. From Wikipedia: ”Novum Testamentum Graece (The New Testament in Greek) is a critical edition of the New Testament in its...

Right, this would be best addressed in my future thread on refuting Catholicism. Right now I am too busy working on other thread ideas that are quite lengthy and time consuming. But Lord willing I would like to do a thread on why I believe Catholicism is unbiblical and I would love to address...

I believe I demonstrated several times openly that the Vatican was involved in the creation of the Nestle and Aland by way of a snapshot from the actual page of the 27th edition of the Nestle and Aland. So it’s not really a conspiracy if you go out and buy a 27th edition Neslte and Aland...

I understand that you feel your correct. But I have 101 reasons for the King James Bible being the Word of God for today with just a few of those reasons being sufficient alone to defend my case here. I believe it is best for me to continue to polish my 101 reasons in a more readable format...

Your taking what I said out of context. But I am not here to convince you; Only God can do so. Peace and blessings be unto you in the LORD.

Source: https://truthischrist.com/27-kjv-miracles/

Modern Versions make Jesus appear to sin: In Matthew 5:22, Modern Translations remove the words “without a cause” in relation to being angry with your brother. The King James correctly includes the words “without a cause,” “But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without...

Well, I never said we could never use Wikipedia. It does not mean Wikipedia does not offer some truth that can even support the faith in some cases. However, the article you pointed to in Wikipedia was an untrustworthy article and not accurate to those who truly have done an in-depth study on...

Words of Jesus are taken away by Modern Translations. Jesus said Heaven and Earth shall pass away but my words shall not pass away (Matthew 24:35). But in Modern Translations some of our Lord’s words have passed away (or they are missing). The words of Jesus on “Fasting so as to cast out...

To all: Some try to say that the Modern Bibles are not based on the Westcott and Hort text. Some will say this because our Modern Bibles are based on the Nestle and Aland New Testament Greek text. But Textual Critic Eldon Jay Epp believes the the Nestle and Alan text is barely different than...

To all: Some have a problem that the chapter and verse numbers were added later as a part of God’s divine hand or providence (Which was clearly a later addition to the originals). But say John 3:16 to another Christian and he knows what you are talking about. God surely knew of their...

To all: The fact of the matter is that the Critical Text of Westcott-Hort differs from the TR (Textus Receptus), mostly by deletions, in 9,970 words out of 140,521, giving a total of 7% difference. In the 480-page edition of the Trinitarian Bible Society Textus Receptus this would amount to...

And so you want me to trust Westcott and Hort who popularized the Modern Textual Criticism movement we have today? Westcott and Hort's work was still used as a significant textual basis (not entirely) for the Nestle and Aland NT Greek text. Yeah, sorry. You can have them if you like. I...