Search results

Not necessarily. A beast is not an individual human. But Satan is also called a beast. The serpent in the Garden was an individual beast of the field. "Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made." "And the Lord God said unto the serpent...

You have this ok, but then stuck on the historical papacy as if it still exists. A mortal wound is just that. The 6th kingdom is not a dead papacy that was, is not, yet is. It is simply just a dead, non-existent kingdom. No one central government controls the earth. There is no future...

A time frame is an age. Time frame: "a period of time, especially a specified period in which something occurs or is planned to take place." Age: "a distinct period of history" Seems one person's time frame is another person's age, no?

So you defy logic with human reasoning, and deny the Second Coming is still yet to happen in a single posted quote of some theological expert. Prove one person in attendance that day was still walking around in Jerusalem in 70AD.

I understand your interpretation. I pointed out you are wrong. The 2 beasts in Revelation 13 are not individual humans. The sea beast represents human government from Babylon during Daniel's time until humanity is tossed into the LOF. No single individual has 7 heads and ten horns. The...

"Thou sawest till that a stone was cut out without hands, which smote the image upon his feet that were of iron and clay, and brake them to pieces. Then was the iron, the clay, the brass, the silver, and the gold, broken to pieces together, and became like the chaff of the summer...

Most of what Paul taught was "a mystery". Paul uses that word like you use "spiritually discerned". Many here constantly state their opinion that other posters are not spiritually discerned. Paul is just nice about his points; that some may have never heard what he was saying prior to the...

Telling me to get help is childish and arrogant.

John was viewing the Second Coming. The Second Coming was in John's mind, not first century politics.

I did not change Scripture at all. I simply pointed out that John was viewing things at the time of the Second Coming. You view things as if they were happening in the first century like a Preterists does. Blame your agreement with Jesuit Preterist theology, not me. Do you not think that 5...

I have used Scripture. You say parallel views. I say two different endings depending on the Confirming of the Covenant during the days of the 7th Trumpet. Daniel 9:27 takes place in the days of the 7th Trumpet. You claim Revelation keeps repeating itself. I say Revelation is a...

When you start rearranging the book of Revelation to fit your human understanding is where you get into trouble like every other poster, who argues over the sticking points. There are no parallel views, because that would have to be argued over and taught as to what those parallel views are...

Peter explains that the Day of the Lord comes as a thief in the night. But the surprise does not last a thousand years, the Day of the Lord lasts a thousands years. All the prophets told how the Day of the Lord would come as vengeance and judgment, but it would not be a thousand years nor a...

Rome, the 4th kingdom. John was not giving us first century history lessons. John was giving us his first hand account of the Second Coming. The five fallen were Babylon, Medes and Persians. Greece, Rome, and the ten toes; I would say as the Holy Roman Empire. We are in the 6th kingdom...

Jesus was born to sit on David's throne in Jerusalem. Not the one you think was destroyed, nor any throne in heaven, as that is what you think that David's throne is in heaven. David's throne is in reference to the legal authority passed down from the ancestor of Jesus by human birth to...

Except you are 1,000 years too early. The wedding feast is with Israel at the start of the Millennial Kingdom, as now Jesus is King. The church does not just plop down as billions onto the streets of Jerusalem. Jesus is not literally married to human individuals, but the concept of a...

So two days are not two periods of equal length, ie 2 ages each a thousand years? Would you say one age equals 2,000 years then?

Except the generation you call "this" was all dead prior to 70AD, so they saw nothing, but stick to your point. Seeing nothing is also an option, no?

As reasonable as calling all post on here, nonsense. Which you frequently do, as that is your style. I simply ask off the wall questions to get people's attention.

Is the church not the body of Christ? That is one of your points in objection to the church being that stone. This is exactly what Jesus said: "Upon this rock (Jesus Christ) I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it." Jesus did not fill the earth. The...