Search results

Yes, but not exclusively: He is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole world (1Jn 2:2 ).

For sins, not for the so-called elect. There is nothing said there about the elect. 1Jn_2:2 And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world.

And you think Biden is a better choice? How ridiculous is that?!?!?!?!

I don't see it because it is not there. It is there only in a Calvinist warped view of soteriology. Foreknowledge is not predestination.

There is nothing in that passage to support your false made-up doctrine of election.

And neither did any of the apostles.

Act 2:38 And Peter said to them, "Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. Believing, repenting and being baptized in the name of Jesus Christ unto the forgiveness of sins and...

That is so not true. If the blessing of reconciliation is not by faith, but is accomplished by the death of Christ, then it would have been universal. The distinction between those reconciled and those not reconciled is that those reconciled believed in God, in Jesus, in the Gospel. But of...

But you didn't and I showed you why you didn't.

Both really poor interpretations give by the KJV. Better intepretations are found in better translations such as the ESV, 2Co 5:19 that is, in Christ God was reconciling the world to himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and entrusting to us the message of reconciliation. Rom...

There is no such thing as non-imputation of sin. Where you could even imagine such a thing is ludicrous. There is forgiveness of sin, but even that is not non-imputation of sin. If you believe that, then that is perhaps why you are so wrong on all of your thinking about reconciliation. It...

There is no significance in the site or place, such as a church, for baptism. There is no significance in the person doing the baptizing. It is not about this church or that church at all. The only significance is in the one being baptized. It is not about the baptizer; rather it is about the...

Give us even one passage in scripture that says that, or even suggests that. It is not there. That is from you, not from God's written word. Rom 11:20 That is true. They were broken off because of their unbelief, but you stand fast through faith. So do not become proud, but fear. 21 For if...

That is not true. Baptizing and teaching are not commands. There is only one command in that passage and that is the command "make". Baptizing and teaching in Matthew 28:10-20 are participials modifying the command "make". They describe the process to be used in the making of the disciples; it...

Rom 11:20 That is true. They were broken off because of their unbelief, but you stand fast through faith. So do not become proud, but fear. 21 For if God did not spare the natural branches, neither will he spare you.

Both Bernie Sanders and Obama are dedicated social Marxists, or communist sympathizers if you prefer. At least Sanders acknowledges that fact although he refers to it as socialism. Obama rose to fame under the leadership of the likes of William Ayres and Bernadette Dohrn, co-founders of the...

It was a ransom paid to God. The standing threat is eternal condemnation for sin. The ransom Jesus paid was our release from that standing threat.

look on the web for e-Sword - the Sword of the LORD with and electronic edge. It is a free on-line Bible study site. Vine's is one of the many Dictionaries available with e-Sword. That site has been my go-to web site for several years now.

With Jesus in Paradise, without question.

You should read what it says in God's word rather than relying on the heretical statements from Calvinist/Reformed Theology. Romans 5:11 pretty clearly says that you are wrong in your analysis.