Search results

Colossians 2:16 (NLT) ”So don’t let anyone condemn you for what you eat or drink, or for not celebrating certain holy days or new moon ceremonies or Sabbaths.” Romans 7:6 “But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and...

Right, it just shows that we are living in the last days where nobody believes God’s Word anymore. They don’t believe Psalms 12:6-7, Proverbs 30:5, etcetera. The believer becomes the final word of authority or the Modern scholar. There is no Bible that exists in their mind that is perfect to...

The NIV is a joke. Even Textual Critics and or Modern Bible Proponents know this translation is a butchered version of God’s Word. https://www.timefortruth.co.uk/the-niv-perversion/ http://mundall.com/erik/NIV-KJV.htm Even the NIV editions over the years do not agree with each other...

Not seeing the relevance to this topic. It’s something you can Google.

If he is Catholic that makes sense he is against the KJB. Here is one of the Catholic books. Notice which version they don’t want you to read.

Not true. Man shall not live by bread alone but by every word of God. Matthew 4:4 is not talking about multiple versions of Jesus.

https://answersingenesis.org/creationism/young-earth/young-earth-creationist-view-summarized-and-defended/ https://www.christianforums.com/threads/what-does-scripture-mean-about-perfection.8019199/...

There is a symbiotic relationship between the Living Word (Jesus) and the Communicated Word (the Scriptures or the Holy Bible). Here are 41 verses: https://www.christianforums.com/threads/the-living-word-the-communicated-word.8157028/ So if it took approximately 4,000 years for the Word to be...

It really is not a true answer to solving the problem. How do you know you have correct doctrines without a perfect Bible? Your response would be like saying the answer to 2 + 2 = 5. It’s a response but it is not a true answer or solution. Your response is illogical and an evasion of the...

First, you didn’t answer my question. Second, I cannot force you to see the truth and I imagine it is just as silly in your mind to believe God has preserved His Word today in a 1600’s English Bible. I imagine you think it is preposterous. But think. How many people today do you think the...

If you don’t have a perfect Bible then how do you know you have the correct doctrines? Modern Translations actually change doctrine for the worse and not for the better.

To all: John says to ”sin not.” (1 John 2:1). Jesus says to ”sin no more” (John 5:14) (John 8:11). It’s not possible to ”sin NOT” or “sin NO MORE” as instructed in God’s Word if the Bible did not teach such truths. Sure, there is grace if one stumbles (Psalms 51), and or even struggles with...

To all: Dear Believer of God’s Word: This derailed argument on this topic of which Bible we should use started because the OP (Johann) favors an original languages interpretation over what the English says in the Bible when it comes to 1 Peter 4:1-2, 2 Corinthians 7:1, and Galatians 5:24...

@RLT63 The NKJV is a bridge Bible to the Modern Translations and Textual Criticism. The NKJV will point to the Nestle and Aland text (NU) and or say this verse is not in the NU, etc. This just shoots one believing God’s Word to begin with because of all the footnotes that make you doubt God’s...

It does not matter. If one does not have a perfect Bible then THEY become the final authority and not the Bible. Every word of God is pure. I believe Psalms 12:6-7 and Proverbs 30:5. Most today do not believe such verses.

I explained one supposed KJB contradiction that you seen as a problem and this just shows that folks are seeing error or contradiction where none exists. You also are not dealing with the problems in the New King James (compared to the KJB). I am not going to keep explaining things that you...

The Catholics really don't know that they are favoring wrong manuscripts that attacks the Trinity. They do not have the spiritual discernment to see that they are holding to the wrong Alexandrian manuscripts. The Catholics want you to believe in trusting in the priests to understand the...

If the NKJV has so much authority that the editors of the ©1982 NKJV actually encourage their readers to alter it as they see fit. You don’t believe it? Here’s what they said: Source: https://av1611.com/kjbp/articles/mcelroy-nkjv.html Also, which New King James Version is your base? Not all...

Again, you’re not getting what I am saying. The Catholics did not take out 1 John 5:7. The gnostics (Arians from Alexandria) had taken out 1 John 5:7, but the Catholics favored these manuscripts not because it did not teach the Trinity but because they want you to believe the Trinity based on...