Search results

Sigh. One more time, the LAW is gender neutral. There is no law that specifically says, "If a man commits (name the crime HERE), he will get between 5-15 years; but if a woman commits the same crime, she gets 1-5 years." To say that women get shorter sentences for committing the same...

Pretty interesting how you say that "men treat women like men." How does ANY man know WHO is a "bitter feminist" and who isn't? I hold doors open for both men and women because it's the polite thing to do. And if a man holds a door open for me, I simply smile and say, "Thank you!" However...

We may be at cross purposes here. But I DO want to address the bolded. There are probably many "-isms" and many causes that started out "innocently"...and evolved (or DEvolved) into something more sinister. The INCEL community comes to mind. The woman who started this cause didn't hate men...

I'm not disputing that. The dispute is about whether or not a man named "Nick" Rockefeller is even related to THE Rockefellers and whether or not THE Rockefellers wanted women in the workforce in order to generate more tax revenue. The Rockefellers who established the Rockefeller Foundation...

They didn't. There is no such animal as "Nick" or Nicolas Rockefeller who is related in any way to THE Rockefeller family. https://knowledgefight.com/primary-sources/2018/4/8/aaron-russo

Exactly! 1 Tim 5:14 and Titus 2:5 are NOT 'stand alone' verses. And while those verses do say that a wife should be "keepers at home", neither of those verses say that she should be ONLY a 'keeper at home'. That's where Proverbs 31 comes into play. Same with Ephesians 5:22. It works in...

How in the world do you know how many hours a week she worked? And while it's true that there's no mention of her working for a 'boss', there's no mention or even hint that she sold the excess from what she made for her household. Plus, as @TLHKAJ mentioned above, the woman had to leave the...

Yup. She did not have the right to keep her own children. Heck, she didn't even have the right to be on a jury that could testify on her behalf to keep her own children. Laws these days in this regard aren't gender specific. The law favors the parent who spends more time with the child...

A comfy "prison"? Well, for a lot of women, it WAS a 'prison' of sorts, because the opportunities availed to women WAY before you, were limited. Maybe because you didn't live through it, you're wondering, "What gives?" Almost seems like because of the way things are NOW, they were ALWAYS...

The bolded is correct. Correct again. The cabin crew can ask the passenger to leave (with them), which is what the supervisor told the unruly passenger. He said (I'm paraphrasing) that the passenger could either go with him off the plane, or the airport police would do it. The unruly...

No problem. :gd :oops: That's weird. Technology at its finest. Chkl:

See the yellow highlighted portion? Two paragraphs above that. The paragraph begins, "She the(n) proceeded..."

I'll see if I can take a screen shot. Might take me a few minutes though.

Yes, she did. It's right there in Scott's own post. I didn't say that the part about the supervisor was highlighted in yellow. I said 2 paragraphs ABOVE the highlighting was where Scott said that.

I did. Yes, highlighted in yellow.

Did you even really WATCH this clip? The passenger "Scott" who recorded the scene posted about it. Around the 4:38 mark, a portion of his post was highlighted in yellow. If you look 2 paragraphs ABOVE the portion being highlighted, you'll CLEARLY see that Scott said that a flight attendant...

Oh gee, look at that. We actually agree.

That's YOUR interpretation...like it or not. So YOU say....

BINGO!!

Agreed. Thank you, Wynona. Apology accepted., not that you had anything to apologize for. After all, you already knew from your first post that you were going to get push-back on this issue. But nonetheless, I'd like to apologize to you too. You're about the same age as my youngest...