Search results

I don’t care to read a book that makes a mockery of Anne Frank’s work.

I don’t see a problem. The other versions say virtually the same thing using other words. I understand the KJV and the modern version I have no problem with anyone using either

I don’t believe in abiogenesis and I don’t believe that humans and chimpanzees share a common ancestor so I couldn’t agree with Theistic Evolution

That’s interesting. There are quite a lot of Christians who believe in Theistic Evolution.

The rod to a shepherd is used for more than correction, it is used to guide the sheep and show them the way. But there is nothing wrong with spanking. It worked on me.

I really like the NET Full Notes edition

If the almighty savior didn’t consider it robbery I have to agree with him And despite all that there is very little difference between modern versions and Westcott and Hort’s version. They are mostly in agreement. What’s in question is whether the material excluded in modern versions should be...

I don’t find those translations objectionable but your characterization of the KJV is absurd saying Jesus was not a thief when the verse says he thought it NOT robbery

Again I was asking you a question about other posters. I wasn’t saying you want to dominate the forum. I’m sorry you got the wrong impression from my post.

I’m on another Christian forum and there are more atheists and agnostics there than Christians and even among the Christians if you say anything critical of evolution you better be ready for the backlash. I just don’t understand why people who have other beliefs feel the need to try to dominate...

I found this article to be very helpful in understanding the sources Bibles are translated from.

I’ve heard some people say the rarest texts but they are rare because no one copied them

I’m not King James only. I use modern versions as well I’m currently using the NET Full Notes Edition. But I don’t believe the Critical Text is more accurate than the Majority Text

4th century I think

https://www.bereanpatriot.com/the-johannine-comma-of-1-john-57-8-added-or-removed/

Yes their claim is that the omitted verses are not in the oldest ( Alexandrian) manuscripts and they were added later to the Majority (Byzantine) manuscripts. But just because something is older doesn’t necessarily make it better and the material could just ss easily been removed from the oldest...

I was talking about @TinMan . I wasn’t talking ABOUT you. I was talking TO you

https://www.newsweek.com/florida-tv-cuts-feed-ron-desantis-shows-explicit-content-books-1786589

It was a different book. The story is false

Go back and read the thread. You’re missing things or ignoring them