Search results

Invincible Ignorance Description: The arguer defends a position simply by refusing to acknowledge the force of the arguments supporting the opposing view. Comments: Some phrases characteristic of this fallacy may include, "I refuse to listen..." "I don't care what you say..." etc...

Two Wrongs do not Make a Right Undistributed Middle Unfalsifiability Unrepresentative Sample Unrepresentative Generalization Untestability Vested Interest Victory by Definition Willed ignorance Wishful Thinking You Too...

Intensional Invalid Reasoning Irrelevant Conclusion Irrelevant Reason Is-Ought Jumping to Conclusions Lack of Proportion Line-Drawing Loaded Language Loaded Question Logic Chopping Logical Fallacy Lying Maldistributed Middle Many Questions Misconditionalization Misleading Accent Misleading...

Cum Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc Curve Fitting Definist Denying the Antecedent Digression Disregarding Known Science Distraction Division Domino Double Standard Either/Or Equivocation Etymological Every and All Exaggeration Excluded Middle False Analogy False Balance False Cause False Dichotomy False...

Bad Seed Bald Man Bandwagon Begging the Question Beside the Point Biased Generalizing Biased Sample Biased Statistics Bifurcation Black-or-White Caricaturization Changing the Question Cherry-Picking the Evidence Circular Reasoning Circumstantial Ad Hominem Clouding the Issue Common Belief Common...

Ad Numerum Ad Populum Ad Verecundiam Affirming the Consequent Against the Person All-or-Nothing Ambiguity Amphiboly Anecdotal Evidence Anthropomorphism Appeal to Authority Appeal to Consequence Appeal to Emotions Appeal to Force Appeal to Ignorance Appeal to Money Appeal to Past Practice Appeal...

Strawperson fallacy: arguing against a view by attacking an exaggerated or absurd extension of the view. "A special case of irrelevant conclusion. Attacking a misstated form of an argument. a deliberately weakened form. https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/strawman Tuo quoque: See Ad hominem. Two...

Post Hoc (post hoc ergo propter hoc): after this on account of this. See False cause. Presumptive Proof; see Ignorance, appeal to. Provincialism: to accept or reject a statement or argument because one identifies with a particular group. Question Begging Epithet: loaded phrase such as "stodgy...

Impromptu Definition: See Persuasive definition. Inconsistent Assumptions: use of premises that in conjunction form a contradiction; use of a self-defeating principle that is as damaging to one's own view as to one's opponent. invincible ignorance fallacy: also known as argument by...

Division: argument based on the assumption that what is true of the whole must be true of the parts. Your logical fallacy is composition or division Doubtable Statement: To accept statements at face value which should be doubted given background information. Equivocation: use' of a term in...

Burden of Proof: The inability, or disinclination, to disprove a claim does not render that claim valid, nor give it any credence whatsoever or the burden of proof lies not with the person making the claim, but with someone else to disprove. Your logical fallacy is burden of proof Circular...

1. Ad hominem abusive: argument that an opponent's view is incorrect because of some personal defect of the opponent. Your logical fallacy is ad hominem 2. Ad hominem circumstantial: attack on a claim on the ground that the opponent is prejudiced in the question because of his special...

Other Fallacies by those in Cults like the watchtower. Website on fallacies with examples Partial List of Fallacies and another is here Thou shalt not commit logical fallacies Accent: ambiguity arising from special stress of words in a sentence, misquoting, taking out of context, emphasizing...

Poor Math, it is really 1^3 I posted a ton of true facts that proves the Trinity. In fact, you are blinded by your invincible ignorance. Defined: invincible ignorance fallacy: also known as argument by pigheadedness, is a deductive fallacy of circularity where the person in question simply...

So What Noah was not teaching flasehood, you are. Comparing yourself with Noah is just funny.

Brother, use a what if there is a Heaven and Eternal Punishment. Which way would he want to place his bet?

http://www.ralphwoodrow.org/assets/books/babylon.html https://archive.org/details/babylonconnectio0000wood https://www.equip.org/PDF/DC187.pdf https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/did-the-catholic-church-have-its-origin-in-paganism...

Point was Baptised in all three titiles of the Trinity.

Maybe in the galaxy Satania! lol

Ok that link is just werid.