Search results

Whoa, dude! At what point did I say that we can ONLY talk about Wynona's POV? At what point did WYNONA -- the AUTHOR OF THIS THREAD -- that ONLY viewpoints about how others triumphed over feminism were welcome? Wynona EXEPECTED as much. Seriously dude, go back and read her opening page...

Why don't you ask the OP? As in Wynona?

I didn't add "per Wynona". I QUOTED Wynona!! Even POSTSED the quote FROM HER!

For the most part. Our buddy Wrangler can't seem to wrap his head around the idea of compromise or that BOTH can 'lead'. Sometimes YOUR idea works; sometimes HER idea works. Kind looks like: Him: Let's go to dinner at that Thai place. Her: I don't really like Thai food. Him: I'm the MAN...

*I* don't say. Wynona, as the OP says. She did not limit the discussion to those who have 'triumphed over feminism." She already understood that not everyone would agree with her. At no time did Wynona say, "Tell me how *YOU* have triumphed over Feminism!" Maybe go through this thread...

Your wish is my command, M'Lady! :thumbsupx1 From the link: (It's only 6 pages long, including a page of references. Pretty fast reading) "Most of the couples (81%) where both spouses perceived the relationship as equalitarian (i.e. egalitarian) were happily married, while most of the couples...

Studies for egalitarian marriages vs. Traditional marriages have proven time and time again, that egalitarian marriages are more successful than Traditional marriages AND that egalitarian marriages do have more intimacy than Traditional marriages.

This thread is a discussion about triumphing over feminism as per Wynona's POV.

Still waiting for you to confrot Naomanos on HIS beliefs... This should be interestinig...

Oh, stoooop. You act as if the PREVIOUS laws weren't women-hating AND...that MANY men STILL feel that those laws should be appropriate.. Such as, a MAN having FULL CONTROL over a woman's paycheck.... Sorry, but laws like THAT were WOMAN-HATING. So, you're taking ONE call from ONE state and...

Ha, Wrangler! Have noticed that you have NO PROBLEM taking on MY 'feminist' views. And yet, you don't address Naomanos' views....which are more egalitarian... Interesting.......

Yes, but ANYONE can take an ideology...or even an item...and use it to harm others! A kitchen knife can be used to either cut meat or to kill someone. And ideology that may SEEM good in a way can also be misused to gain control over THEIR benefit. The laws are not in place because they're...

Only into the first 10 seconds of this video, and already I'm like, "OMG..." She's supposed to put HER ego aside??? What about HIS ego???? Why are your videos always about what WOMEN are supposed to do... ...and NEVER about what MEN are supposed to do?

And THATs part of the problem. It's resolved in HIS mind (as in, I gave her a good enough excuse for this stuff happening), but not HERS (as in, he reallllly didn't explain what was going on 3 months ago)

The answer would take a few books to explain. But SOME reasons are: 1. Fear of losing their 'status' within marriage if they spoke about how they REALLY feel. 2. Religious deference. About a third of US women believe that the Bible gives men 'divine authority' over women. However, even THIS...

I didn't make that claim, but doing as you USUALLY do, you read into what is online...both in this thread, other threads, AND the lopsided videos you keep posting. Radical feminism is man-hating. Liberal feminism is not. The same with INCEL's. INCEL's are a small group of women-hating men...

Because 39% isn't "nearly half." Did you actually READ the Pew study?

No, I reject YOUR definition of feminism because it's WRONG. There is not hatred on MY part, Wrangler. Only yours. So obvious, as I'm not the ONLY woman on this thread and others who sees that in you.

OMG!!! This is so OBVIOUSLY AI!!!! This woman isn't even REAL!!!!!

And the audience knows she's a feminist because.........................? You have no idea if she tried to "shame the interviewer by saying she is asked if SHE is happy." The interviewer even told her that "It's not THAT kind of an interview." So, what kind of an interview WAS it? Put...