Search results

But Revelation 20 separates them it describes the binding and the reigning and your two text's were the binding

What do you mean you said that it said millennium and the words you posted said thousand years? It can’t get more valid than that

No it doesn’t the actual text you posted yourself says thousands years not millennium

Actually it doesn’t literally say the millennium ends it says the thousand years and the text in both parts that you highlighted is satans binding not the reigning

Actually I’m an amill and what I believe is that satans little season is at the end part of the millennial age not after it. It’s after the binding ends not the reigning

Humm sorry but I still don’t get what you’re actually saying or claiming

Hi Scott what exactly are you saying?

So all day today I have been debating with about 5 or 6 of you and all you have done is post views about me that I never claimed. You have also thrown verses at me that have no bearing on this topic Not one of you have answered my direct question about proving how a literal mark doesn’t...

I have never claimed that no one can repent from having the mark what I claimed is that if it’s a literal mark then they can because of John 3:16 thus the mark is real and can’t be a literal mark but a symbolic mark of unrepentant devotion to the beast

Once again??????

So then you agree that if they can’t repent from a literal mark that then contradicts John 3:16

I have already explained this but stop side stepping with questions and explain how a literal make doesn’t contradict scripture

???????? I have no idea why you quoted this to me I’m talking about how scripture can’t contradict scripture

No because they believe in a third coming and many other events after the second coming so we are very different in our views

No it’s not that simple and How does that address what I have been asking you? Once again you are avoiding it please address my points and stop posting random statements Hint let the scriptures interpret the scriptures your literal view contradicts John 3:16

I don’t see that and I never said that or even believe that please read what I said Once again I’m not debating what happens to the ones who have the mark I’m debating what the mark actually is

Yes Jesus can return tomorrow the second coming is all that is needed to still happen

My issue isn’t do the ones with the literal mark repent it’s can they Repent?

Once again you avoided my post and the scriptures by not dealing with what I posted or what the scriptures say I agree and I’m not using Gods word against his word at all I’m actually doing the opposite and using Gods word to reveal His word I have stated many times that whoever receives the...

You only made a statement but you avoided the scriptures that I posted so show were I was wrong in these scriptures Your statement is empty and just chatter all I did was believe in what the bible actually says thus you are stuck on traditional thinking that isn’t actually backed by the scriptures