Search results

I have never denied a kingdom on earth amil teaching is a kingdom on earth it’s just not the literal thousand years with Jesus physically on the earth It’s spiritual on earth and in heaven

Not at all we are apart of the kingdom on earth because it’s within us

Yet Revelation 19 it says nothing of the antichrist or Armageddon or even Jesus and his armies coming down to the earth. Do you see that events always need to be added to the scriptures to prove the futurist view? The battle in rev 16 is the battle at Armageddon which is a different battle than...

Do you believe that anyone knows when the second coming is?

So were in those verses does it show Jesus on the earth? Once again John see a vision of Jesus up in heaven. The enemies are on the earth but its not a literal battle its a symbolic vision of Jesus defeating all of His enimies with the sword of His mouth His word. Do you believe that this is...

Except it doesn't say on the earth and it actually says John sees a vision where the thrones were set. So if its literal and on the earth would it really omit that? Yes I have and we are in the kingdom on earth and in heaven

Daniel 7:13-14 13 “In my vision at night I looked, and there before me was one like a son of man,[a] coming with the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient of Days and was led into his presence. 14 He was given authority, glory and sovereign power; all nations and peoples of every language...

Comon be honest with yourself here it says that Jesus is approaching heaven not the earth. You said that the bible doesn't show Jesus reigning in heaven and I proved that it does. That still doesn't have anything to do with the topic of Revelation chapter 20 not stating Jesus on the earth

Daniel 7:13-14 13 “In my vision at night I looked, and there before me was one like a son of man,[a] coming with the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient of Days and was led into his presence. 14 He was given authority, glory and sovereign power; all nations and peoples of every language...

Thanks but I do know all of the events that you are referring too as I use to believe in the same views as you do until I was challenged to actually study them for myself. Then I realized that what I and most believe is not actually in the bible so thats why I debate them. For example and...

Did you read my post? You keep saying that people are being deceived but thats not what I stated the deceiving is. If Revelation 20 is supposed to be literal the events below are omitted from it Jesus on the earth Jerusalem A time of peace on the earth Jesus ascending back up to heaven (He...

But it was never actually prophesied or was anyone ever actually told to build it. It symbolic for the church that God is building. When Jesus said that "it is finished" it was finished. The bible doesn't contradict itself. so let that show the proper interpretation.

Think about the Christian theology is there a need or even a purpose for a future temple? Wasn’t Jesus sacrifice enough?

Once again you completely ignored the fact that so much of futurist views are omitted in revelation 20 You misunderstood what I said that the deceiving is go back to post #86 Paul stated 4 times in the bible that the gospel had reached the whole known world in his day. Yes much of the church...

Actually it is satan is released in verse 7 before his final attempt to wipe out Gods people but verse 5 says that the rest of the dead come back to life after the thousand years and the rest of the dead are raised in verse 11 and 12 at the judgement day After satan is cast into the lake of fire...

First of all you completely ignored the fact that so much of the futurist views our omitted in revelation chapter 20 Second I don’t go against the biblical agenda at all because of Jesus we now reign in life over sin and death. Through the spreading of the gospel people from all nations can...

Verse 5 shows us that the reigning ends at the end of our world after the release of satan in verse 7

Because none of those you just named are the descriptions that John gives of antichrist. The beast and the antichrist are different demonic beings assigned different tasks by satan. They influence and possess nations and their leaders. We learn how they work in Daniel chapter 10.

So why then does John name and describe them differently and shows them having a different purpose? The only four verses in the entire Bible that mentions antichrist are nothing like the sea beast of Revelation. I don’t understand why so many Christians get so hung up on the antichrist being...

Because its full of symbolic language and it also omits so much of what you believe