Search results

1:1 Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ λόγος καὶ ὁ λόγος ἦν πρὸς τὸν θεόν καὶ θεὸς ἦν. ὁ λόγος 1:2 οὗτος ἦν ἐν ἀρχῇ πρὸς τὸν θεόν In the beginning, it was. A word and a word, it was with a God; and the God it was. A word another it was in the beginning with a God.

Exactly.

He still doesn't understand that the Arians believed in the pre-existence of souls... an Origenism. Arius thought people could become sons of God while alive. There are many Church Fathers who believed that there was when the son wasn't. It is not a particularly Arian concept.

Evertime you think he needs to be Jesus Christ. "I AM a WAY a TRUTH and a LIFE, no one is being [sent] to the FATHER but thru me"

Perhaps, pattern. Pattern of colors and images associated with a form. Still this doesn't prove your point as you will see later. You have a pattern which shares divine action of God. The English is deceptive, but not disclusive. Actually, the NIV reflects it inaccurately and decides to use a...

No, you haven't. You still believe God needs to be a man.

You realize Mark 7:13 says nothing about the Talmud and may be about a custom rather than tradition.

They don't make diagrams of a trinity or venerate phony icons and relics of crosses with Jesus on them calling it god.

There was no such thing as oral tradition at that time.

Jesus said no such thing. Your Jewish friends.

What oral tradition? It didn't exist then. And yet you ignore them about idolatry.

Don't you mean Israelites? Maybe you should up the ante with more of it

Actually, El has been replaced with Elohim in the Tanak, as well as Aramaic syntax with Rabbinic syntax.

Do you know how to use the Blue Letter Bible yet?

Heaven within the Greek and Hebrew cognates is actually a rock elevation, and the cognates for earth actually mean soil. There is no known word for planet Earth in Hebrew, or perhaps even Greek.

Belief is not the same as trust πιστις. A god who is cruel is untrustable. You can't have it both ways.

What is more dangerous, saying the son was only human, or demanding God is cruel enough to give out Eternal Conscious Torment? ECT is a blank bullet.

Ah, crummy Greek scholarship. I think it should be translated, "; and the God it was". More so, qualitative means we think it should be like an English mass noun or multicount singular noun.

I believe it means to bend the back pros with. Reverence yes, but not proof of deity.

How does someone write a paper that fast, and expect other someones to read it in one day?