Search results

You claim the Rich Man and Lazarus is a literal story which depicts a man with eyes and ears and a tongue burning in eternal flames of torment - right? Oh, but you think you can pick and choose which parts are literal and which parts are symbolic, right? Yes, I can see where there won't be any...

You admitted you await a future "Man of Sin" - a Jesuit idea. What's that make the followers of it? Congratulations...I've never heard a person describe their "private interpretations" so eloquently. I see the Beast for exactly what it can only be: the papacy. Spurgeon says anyone who denies...

Agree. I've told him repeatedly Scripture only identifies 2 types of bodies - the mortal and resurrection - but he's dead set on believing in "disembodied soul bodies" so the Rich Man and Lazarus can be a literal story.

No, but he believes in "disembodied soul bodies" - because the Immortal Soul crowd will believe anything. Spot on, friend. Amen

I wanted to ensure I didn't miss one of his posts, is all. I already responded to your "explanation" with irrefutable proof of your errors. When will you explain to us how "disembodied souls" have eyes, tongues, fingers, bosoms, etc.? When Jesus said angels are coming to reap the harvest, does...

He says he's not a Jesuit Futurist, but follows Jesuit Futurism's future arrival of the Man of Sin - got it. Not sure what you're talking about. There's only Jesuit Preterists, Jesuit Futurists, and Protestant Historicists, the 3 main eschatological schools of thought. Do all of your doctrines...

No.

What post #? Because if it's the post I think you're referring to, you didn't answer a single point, such as how making Rich Man/Lazarus a literal story causes so many Bible contradictions. Of course, Spiritual Israelite refuses to explain how "disembodied souls" have tongues, eyes, fingers...

It's not dishonest to ask for clarification.

Are you so naive as to think you can climb on here and ignore Rome's Counter-Reformation in which they invented the diversionary tactic lies of Jesuit Preterism and Jesuit Futurism to counter the truth of Protestant Historicism that exposed papal Rome as all the above - of which you'd be aware...

Which post would that be?

There's so much error here, like the mosquito at the nudist colony, I'm not sure where to begin ;) If we make this passage literal, that introduces many Bible contradictions. The "comforted" are the church who have the Comforter. The "tormented" are the Jews upon whom "wrath has come upon upon...

Words mean things. It doesn't say "Stephen" went to heaven. It's YOU who doesn't understand what happens when people die! You're own words indicate you don't understand the difference between a "soul" and "spirit" - allow me to educate you: According to Genesis 2:7 KJV, the Soul comes into...

Once again, you side with catholicism's "truth" and oppose Protestantism, just like a good Jesuit. No, the words of Jesus calling God the God of the living are not there to prove the dead are already in heaven, they're there to prove the resurrection. Those who say the opposite "stealeth...

Did you know Tyndale rebuked the catholic church leader Sir Thomas More for doing exactly what you're doing? “The true faith putteth forth the resurrection, which we be warned to look for every hour. The heathen philosophers, denying that, did put forth that the souls did ever live. And the...

"The hour is coming when all that are in the graves shall hear the voice of the Son of God..." I can't understand why the Immortal Soul crowd can read this and yet continue to insist the dead are anywhere else but the grave sleeping "the sleep of death" and awaiting resurrection.

Wholeheartedly agree that the end of the 70 Weeks was about 34 A.D. and the 70 A.D. destruction of Jerusalem was the AoD - but I also believe it's a "dual prophecy" pointing to the end time persecution of the "Israel of God". A long time ago, a learned preacher said "What is local and literal...

Amem, "hellucinations" is a great description! I agree, the focus of the entire passage in 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18 KJV is not heaven, but the resurrection which happens down here, not up there. I wouldn't say "impossible" - but the idea is definitely not Biblical: God preserved Noah in the...

Davy, God would no sooner refer to a building where the blasphemous sacrifices offered therein would be a collective Jewish middle finger in His face as the "temple of God" than would a saintly mother's children refer to her house as "the best little whorehouse near your house" - right or wrong...

The Dragon is Satan, not the antichrist Beast. The antichrist Beast is the Papacy. The False Prophet is apostate Protestantism which claims "Sola Scriptura" but adheres to the Papal doctrine "as a reminder of the Mother Church from which the non-Catholic sects broke away - like a boy running...