Search results

That's extremely weak, friend. From the time those four generals took over until Rome conquered, the empires of Seleucid, Ptolemy, Cassander, and Lysimachus continued to be referred to as such - so limiting "their kingdom" to merely the time the four generals reigned is absurd. Gonna explain 2...

Yes...he definitely was "a partaker of the Holy Ghost" but riches became more important than righteousness. Did not King David pray "take not Thy Holy Spirit from me" when he broke the 6th and 7th?

Didn't Judas ask to join the church? Didn't Judas start out sincere? Didn't Judas - like all the disciples - receive the Holy Ghost? Didn't Judas eventually apostatize and betray Jesus? Didn't Judas receive the title "Son of Perdition"? That's exactly what happened in church history - good...

The only one making a fool of himself is the fool who doesn't differentiate between the individual antichrist forerunners spoken of by John's day and the ANTICHRIST KINGDOM Paul says was being kept in check by the "restrainer" Pagan Rome. Once Pagan Rome was taken out of the way, the papal...

Can't you just google them like the rest of us?

Good gravy, it's as if I'm writing in an alien language to you people. Antiochus didn't arise "in the latter time" of the line of the 20+ Seleucid kings - he arose as number 8 at the MID POINT!!!!! He cannot be the Little Horn, for prophecy says it rises at the end of the line of these Greek...

Yes, the Third "Leopard" Beast aka "belly and thighs of brass" aka "rough goat" all point to Greece, with the four divisions of Greece remaining "Greek" until the Fourth "iron" Beast - Rome - conquered everything and became a world empire.

Let's get something straight: LONG BEFORE THERE WAS AN SDA CHURCH, the entire Christian world was teaching Christianity was entering the "1,000 years of peace" (because the papal antichrist had received its "deadly wound" and was no longer slaughtering "Protestant heretics" who believe "Solo...

All Jesuit Futurists do

OT: the Israelites who followed God were called "the church that was in the wilderness." NT: the Christians who follow Christ are called "the church that follows Christ" - began with Andrew.

The starting point of the 70 is the starting point of the 2300 - because the one is "cut off" ("chatak") from the other. The math is actually very very simple: 457 B.C. + 2300 years = 1844 A.D. - the "cleansing of the sanctuary"

If everyone understands that, then why do they ignore history? The early church, according to the ECFs, was teaching Paul's Restrainer was Pagan Rome, but today "everyone" is running around insisting it is the "holy spirit" or "the holy spirit filled church" or some other "agent of holiness"...

Friend, it's high time people abandon this idea that the four division of Greece were somehow "additional kingdoms" to be factored into the prophetic timeline between Greece and Rome. The fact is that the four divisions of Greece remained Greek - in culture, education, science, philosophy...

I think we both agree that "deception" is the greatest threat to the end times church - that alone should warrant a thorough examination of our beliefs, with a level of scrutiny that only the most confident are willing to abide. I'm not saying this applies to you, but It's my experience that...

There is nothing in Revelation that contains the teachings of Jesuit Futurism: rebuilt temple in Jerusalem restarted sacrificial system literal Jewish eschatological centrality rise of a Jewish evil individual "antichrist" 7 year peace treaty between Arabs and Jews pre-tribulation rapture...

Who told you the "prince that shall come" is antichrist? There are only two candidates for the coming "prince" in Daniel 9: "Messiah the prince" or "prince Titus" who came destroyed Jerusalem and the temple. Nowhere is there any mention of "antichrist" - it's purely Jesuit Futurist conjecture...

If Luke can refer to "the church that was in the wilderness" then I can refer to "the church that Judas arose up in but went out from" because of apostasy. So, too, the antichrist will do the same. Your idea that the antichrist will be Jewish finds no support in Scripture.

At the latter time of the Greek divisions, PAGAN Rome arose and attacking horizontally toward the South, East, and Pleasant Land (Palestine) but then went on as PAPAL ROME to attack vertically at the heavenly sanctuary of God and cast the truth to the ground. So, yes, the Little Horn is Roman...

The Seleucid kingdom ruled for a century and a half before Antiochus and then just over a century after he died, making him just two decades past the midpoint. No way that's "in the latter time of their kingdom" - it's more precisely the "middle time".

That's funny, seeing that Futurist ideas were unknown to the world until the sixteenth century Jesuits invented it - hence the name "Jesuit Futurism" or Jesuit "Left Behind" Futurism, if you lump in Darby's erroneous ideas. The Reformers, the SDA church, and every other Protestant Historicist...