Search results

I used to be King James Only. It’s a fine translation but it’s not perfect. There’s nothing wrong with having a preference for it as long as you don’t let it become an idol. Having contempt for studying the original language makes no sense and you referred to the original language yourself when...

But the scholars that translated the KJV and the notes in it were divinely inspired. So the KJV is perfect, Christians can be perfect and let me guess the earth is 6,000 years old right?

Okay then we should take a look at the border, How do you rate Biden on his handling of refugees and illegal immigrants?

2Sa 15:6 -7 How could this be 40 years when David only ruled for 40 years? Check your perfect version. Here are some more not saying I agree with everything at this site Errors in the King James Version (Boy, are there a lot of them) – The Superior Word

If you bothered to check the link in the post you are responding to you would find the author prefers the KJV. The book is highly critical of Textual Criticism and modern translations.

A house divided against itself cannot stand. Your argument makes no sense. And there is nothing wrong with studying the original Greek and Hebrew. You are a King James Only advocate no matter what you call yourself. I actually agree with you on some things but not so much on conspiracy theories.

https://www.gotquestions.org/KJV-only.html

This is a link to a book I enjoyed that is more in line with your beliefs. Editing God: Textual Criticism and Modern Bibles Analyzed: Fortner, Michael D.: 9781734399011: Amazon.com: Books

https://www.amazon.com/Differences-Between-Bible-Versions-Zeolla/dp/0759625018

The Catholic Church has done many terrible things throughout history but it makes no sense for them to take 1John 5:7 out of the Bible, Unitarians argue that the CC was responsible for having this verse put in the KJV

https://www.bereanpatriot.com/whats-the-best-bible-translation-and-more-importantly-why/

You brought up that I quoted Isaiah that our works are as filthy rags in another thread and that I liked MailmanDan’s posts on another forum

Again, you should have read my post, it explains how W&H’s text replaced the TR

Why did they leave this verse in modern translations then Mat 28:19 - Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, ?

My approach to the Bible is that the NKJV is my base and I use the NET Bible for the notes

The post I asked if you read is not about textual criticism and you had no problem quoting things I said previously that weren’t even addressing you

I’ve already stated I didn’t believe the Alexandrian texts are superior to the Byzantine. You are really one to talk about lengthy posts. If you don’t want to read posts by other people don’t expect them to read yours. It’s interesting you bring up 1John 5:7. Your previous posts claim that...

It fits

Did you read my post? It’s not based on the Berean Patriot article that I linked.