Search results

similarly i have heard way more about "calvinism" from people who hate it and are only talking about it in order to destroy it. later i found out most of what they say doesn't reflect reality, at all. if we have to put names to things, people who hate 'calvinism' assume all 'calvinists' are in...

the what now?? OSAS is a term used only by people who deny the Biblical security of our salvation, which is fully established by hosts of scripture declaring the saving power & work of God. it is falsely defined by a powerless, Christless, completely carnal view of salvation in which there is...

just more slander, refusal to repent, ((paying attention @Cassandra?)) & disrespect for authority. CC is renown for being decidedly anti-catholic.

Leviticus 19:18 is agapao, not agape a verb not a noun deal with it

This is My commandment, that you love one another as I have loved you (John 15:12) that's "love" - agapao not agape "loved" - agapao not agape anyone who thinks agape is fundamentally different from agapao ((other than one being a noun and the other a verb)) is simply making things up for the...

for the record i keep sabbath, yet obey the commandment not to judge anyone over it. as is becoming to the sons of God, i will, without respect of persons, adamantly & scripturally oppose anyone who disobeys that commandment and seeks to judge the saints over such things. have at ye

alright i'll do the legwork for you. it's only 5 pages. my first posts in this thread: mr. telephones first post in this thread: i posted scripture and truth. in contrast, he immediately, unprovoked, posted a direct attack on me personally, accusing me of denying the Bible, willfully...

because i believe Romans 16:17

It is the duty of an elder to refute false doctrine. Going forward I will stick to that. in this case we are not dealing with a man who has not been previously rebuked, but one who demonstrably despises correction. That's a relevant fact.

Mr cellphone claims Psalm 111 says the decalogue isn't part of the law I demonstrated he is wrong. That's all. His particular error in that matter isn't about derivation of words but completely different words.

Agape is simply the noun form of the verb agapao. Fact.

My doctrine: John 11:25-26 Jesus said to her, "I Am The Resurrection and The Life. The one who believes in Me will live, even though they die; and whoever lives by believing in Me will never die. Do you believe this?" Which part of this are you calling 'deceptive' and why?

Then perhaps you have not paid close enough attention. Go back to the first posts I made in this thread and see his replies. Have a look at the denigrating posts he put on my profile page. He is carrying arguments from years ago on another forum here, when I proved that his attacks on the...

never said that. you're slandering again. informed you with infallible proof that your private interpretation of Psalm 111 is completely unfounded and false. it's "precepts" not commandments, and it decidedly is not declaring the decalogue isn't part of "the law" for the 300th time, see...

no. etymology is origin of words we are not talking about 'derivation of words' in Psalm 111 -- we are talking about completely different words, "precept" vs. "commandment" this is not, a is derived from A this is, A vs. B you are a huge mess, phone-person. a mess. you have zero legitimate...

done. you have zero legitimate argument. this was settled years ago. you are such a mess; it's ridiculous. you are a very sad man, and i don't blame her she had good reasons. get over it. look at yourself.

you a mess dude. you don't care about Christ; all you care about is personally attacking those who correct you. your private doctrines have been refuted 1,000 times but you just can't let go vain all you do is slander. & pat yourself on the back for it. wow such a mess disgraced, banned...

"precept" Definition from Oxford Languages noun. a general rule intended to regulate behavior or thought. these can be reduced to two: Deuteronomy 6:4 & Leviticus 19:18 neither of which don't happen to be part of Exodus 20, and both of which you claim are "nailed to the cross" and no longer...

((prepares self for telephone-person to respond with nothing but spurious personal attacks and old arguments previously thoroughly disproven multiple times yet again...)) because there's nothing new under the sun. God knows the thoughts of men, that they are vanity hence JESUS OF NAZARETH my...

today is the sabbath of the Jews are you meditating on law & works & a supposed righteousness of your own willpower & achievements? or are you meditating on Christ our LORD and the One Work He did that saves?