Search results

You skipped Acts 2:38 again. You even told sinners that they are saved by grace through faith as they read it, without agreeing with it. You think Romans was written to the sinners of Rome.

The Problem With Using Strong’s Concordance Dictionary.

Strong was determined to destroy the KJV. He did it. He was only an honorary linguist. He was not fluent in Greek or Hebrew. He sparked this... Differences between the Textus Receptus and the Nestle Aland/United Bible Society Text - Textus Receptus Bibles

Do you think that 1 Cor 14:2 is speaking of known tongues or unknown tongues? It should say this?... 2 For he that speaketh in A KNOWN tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God: for no man understandeth him; howbeit in the spirit he speaketh mysteries. Yes or no?

Every saint is an equal in the NT priesthood. It is the wretced RCC that created a so-called "laity". Every saint is of a royal priesthood, not some exorcist in a robe at a mass. Everything about the RCC is corrupt, especially starting the division I am speaking of in Christendom. The 5 fold...

Davy, you used Strongs to debunk your KJV Bible. Think about what you did. I know, because I have an interlinear too, and I used to think the KJV was a mess because of Strongs. Then, I realized Strongs was the fake news, not the KJV.

As a matter of fact also, the word "unknown" in the phrase "unknown tongue" is NOT in the Greek NT manuscripts of 1 Corinthians 4. The KJV translators added that word "unknown". KJV 2 For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God: for no man understandeth him...

Modernists believe James Strong over the ancient KJV translators. This way they too can become closet translators. Finding new and endless meanings to special words and phrases, to appear smart to new babies in the Lord.

You just debunked the KJV with phony Greek. Crafty.

The modern translations, which say exactly opposite of much of the KJV are what's out in left field. They were created by biased theologians that disagreed with the wording of the KJV VS their beliefs. Modern translations are customized, like the NWT is made for the JW's. That's exactly why...

The Catholic church is the founder of protestantism. She protested Peter and Acts 2:38 for the last 1700 years. The sub-protestants you are speaking of(that also protest Peter and Acts 2:38) are your Church's daughters. The RCC is the original protestant, beginning at the council of Nicea, 325ad.

Tell your priest to stop play acting the role of a high priest in the OT tabernacle. He looks goofy in that robe, attending to an altar that God does not dwell in. Think about it. God dwells in humans, not the silly playhouse with the cup of wafers in it....LOL.

No, the OT is abolished for the Spirit led saint. You are not a Spirit led saint, therefore you use OT relics. You mimic the OT priest to try to sooth your conscience because you are not under the Law of the Spirit. You are, and always have been, under the OT Law. Enjoy.

And it never ends!

Yes. It is all about "visuals" to sway the masses and appear holier than others. They teach their underlings that some of the statues can weep etc.(come to life). Folks are voluntarily blinding themselves.

LOL(runs to modern versions).

Did you repent, get baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of your sins and recieve the gift of the Holy Ghost as a newborn infant? You never needed deliverance from sin since your infancy? Only non Catholics have to be redeemed from the Law of sin and death? Catholics are not...

The RCC is the most OT form of Christendom than any of them. They even replicate the Holy Of Holies in their services. The priest mimics the high priest of the tabernacle in their services too. Crazy stuff. Absolutely nothing like this happened in the NT church.

Correct. Now, what foreign language is this?... 2 For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God: for no man understandeth him; howbeit in the spirit he speaketh mysteries

You recieved the Holy Ghost as a newborn? Are you John the Baptist?