Search results

The Erza 6:14 challenge is irrelevant for what i have presented, as I accept that the word "after" in Daniel 9:26a suggests that there is a gap on the timeline between when the 69 weeks of years ends, as prophesied in Daniel 9:25, and when the Messiah is cut off. Now that means that I am...

Your continual goading of members will cause problems for you and many members will simply put you on ignore as you turn them off with your words. Sadly, many pertinent suggestions that you may be able to contribute to the conversation, as to what is meant by the scriptures, will be lost. Have...

And so you confirm my statement that you have not provided any evidence to support your claim that Erza 6:14 helps to understand the five independent prophecies contained in Daniel 9:24-27. Hinting at or providing clues does not cut it as to providing the evidence that what you are suggesting...

Why do you not practice what you demand of others? If I am wrong as you claim, then you should be able to provide the evidence that shows how and why I am wrong. Without doing that, your posts become meaningless.

The question that you have not answered in your quoted rebuttal is: - "Why was King David said to be a man after God's own heart?"

For the record, you have not explained why the Ezra 6:14 challenge is so important to the understanding Daniel 9:24-27. You have not provided in any post in this thread an explanation as to why you believe it is so important. All that you have been claiming is that any post that does not...

Perhaps your theology is flawed. King David was encouraged to sinned three times by Satan, and when he came to his senses after having committed those sins, he repented and was forgiven by God for those sins each time that he committed them. If King David had not repented, of the third sin he...

The question does not have to be answered by myself because I have not made any reference to how the Daniel 9:25 prophecy fits into the timeline of the 70 weeks of years. It is you who has to justify that there is a Ezra 6:14 dependency that prompts when the second separate prophecy of verse 25...

That seems to be true in your eyes. It is man who has determined how the prophecy should be understood and they hang onto the proposition that all of Daniel 9:24-27 is just simply one prophetic word from God delivered by the Angel Gabriel to Daniel. It is my view that there are five distinct...

Ezekiel 18:25 states this: - 24 "But when a righteous man turns away from his righteousness and commits iniquity, and does according to all the abominations that the wicked man does, shall he live? All the righteousness which he has done shall not be remembered; because of the unfaithfulness of...

No, that is not true. God said before the Flood that He would not contend with living people on the face of the earth for more than 120 years. What you are pushing with your universalism is that God will contend with those who have been dispatched into the Lake of Fire for as many years as is...

The statement that God will not lose you is true. The sad thing is that if we chose to lose God then God has no way of reversing our decision. However, God's Grace does allow us to repent while we are still drawing breathe so that we can live once more. The question that we all need to answer...

Only in your eyes. I suspect that God will have the last word on what you push as "Good Theology," and you will not be able to repent if you find yourself in the Lake of Fire.

Okay then, you have made a Christ centred determination in your interpretation of the Daniel 9:24-27 prophecy. What about what Daniel wrote in chapter 7 about the Little Horn wanting to change the appointed times and the law where Daniel wrote: - 25 He will speak out against the Most High and...

What time span does the word after have? is it immediately or ten years or 100 years after the completion of the 62 weeks of years? Some introduce a three and a half period of time into their conclusions. We all should allow for some period of float, unless we drain the swamp first. If the...

So be it @MatthewG. Continue bolstering your false argument if you like. If this conversation keeps going back and forth, it will only boost our score card of posts.

Ah Patrick, all people can benefit from the scriptures if they chose to apply it soundly in their lives. The sad part is that many people reject what the scriptures state like you are attempting to do here in this thread.

Ah Matthew, the truth hurts when it is spoken. Taking in any rubbish is not healthy for the soul or the body as you well know. And yes, I do sleep soundly and do not wake up bitter as you are suggesting. Why do you use a false argument to rebut what I have posted as using a false argument...

But sadly Patrick, it is you and your fellow universalists who are changing the understanding of the scriptures to suit your biased theology.

But not if it is rubbish with respect to the teachings of God. That will be the death of us if we embrace it.