Search results

why did they try to kill Him for saying this? do some research: https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/uploads/tx_sgpublisher/produkte/leseproben/9783161470981.pdf

You didn't understand a single thing I said? Whoosh? Right over your head? OK I will try harder with the next unbeliever. This place has so many

this forum is so weird. o_O

you want to know what few is? let me challenge you: go to 100 churches in your town and ask the people there if Christ is God. next year tag or PM me and tell me how many of them deny His deity and how many confess it. tell me how reluctant the ones who admit it were, to confess it. tell me how...

harpagmos: to be clung to or prized although He was in substance, God, He did not consider His equality with God something to cling to, but humbled Himself, being found in human form, as a servant, He surpassed all servanthood, being obedient even to death morphé: the essential intrinsic inner...

my God! - Thomas, speaking to Jesus, John 20:28 you have believed Jesus, speaking to Thomas, John 20:29 well @Aunty Jane i guess you've got to go pick up stones and murder our Blessed Lord & Savior & His apostle now. duty calls eh pharisees gonna pharisee i guess i'll let you be. a word of...

ok, i am telling you the truth you are rejecting it you would rather die than bow before the name of Jesus ((you will do both, Philippians 2)) you have no argument that is what we all see happening here.

so your excuse for your unbelief is that "there are other saviors" ??? that's what you're going to tell Jesus when you bow before Him?

you want to change Ego Eiemi to 'I existed' because you have a theological issue with it. but the trouble is you have no basis to do so, because the text is not in any form of future tense. it is present indicative. not 'I was' but "I AM, I AM" grammatically it makes perfect sense - but your...

Qal Imperfect tense. which is not necessarily 'future' in the sense of the English language. it indicates present, unfinished action. this doesn't directly correlate with the English tenses. He Is, and He continues to be. when Christ, the Angel of the LORD tells Moses this in Exodus 3, the...

Exodus 3:14 in Septuagint: καὶ εἶπεν ὁ θεὸς πρὸς Μωυσῆν ἐγώ εἰμι and in Hebrew: וַיֹּ֤אמֶר אֱלֹהִים֙ אֶל־מֹשֶׁ֔ה אֶֽהְיֶ֖ה אֲשֶׁ֣ר אֶֽהְיֶ֑ה Exodus 3:14 in English: God said to Moses I AM THAT I AM talking about whether 'אֲשֶׁ֣ר' means who or which or that is trivial. it does not...

He is before all things, and in Him all things consist! (Colossians 1:17) I AM the First and the Last: the Living One, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen! (Revelation 1:17-18) Jesus is alive. He isn't 'past tense' if you don't believe that, 'research' isn't going to do...

But of Him you are in Christ Jesus, who became for us wisdom from God — and righteousness and sanctification and redemption — that, as it is written, “He who glories, let him glory in the LORD.” (1 Corinthians 1:3-31)

He says it over and over and over and over and over. He expects us to think. why did they pick up stones to put Him to death? for what they called blasphemy: they understood Him to be unambiguously presenting Himself as equivalent with God. and how many times did they do that? do people not...

you mean who He is He is never 'past tense' -- He is before all things and all things are by Him & for Him. He is the Beginning & the End and the First and the Last. He is I AM THAT I AM ((Isaiah 44:6, Revelation 22:13)). He IS -- saying 'who Jesus was' is a theologically ignorant thing to...

For where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator (Hebrews 9:16) how does anyone inherit something without the death of the one from whom it is inherited? in Jewish culture? and i notice that you completely ignored it, but instead of addressing it, waved...

and Jesus Himself emphatically says and demonstrates that He is bodily risen and bodily ascended. so what we have here is clear: you actively reject Him & His Word you teach false doctrine you are a cultist, not a Christian

Luke 24, John 20, Acts 10 all describe very specifically that He was bodily resurrected. in Luke He Himself explicitly tells them He is flesh & bone because they think He is only a spirit. it directly addresses & unquestionably refutes the false cultic doctrine you are trying to spread...

then you are in great error, and in conflict with Christ Himself, denying even the very gospel itself: that He came, He died, and He Himself rose, He Himself ascended and He Himself will return. And as they thus spake, Jesus Himself stood in the midst of them, and saith unto them, Peace unto...

**ahem** Zechariah 12 "ME whom they pierced" **cough**