Search results

Actually, I am attempting to point you back to Acts 2:38 and lead you out of modernism. You shouldn't take off so quick. You need this.

:cool:

I trust Jesus when he gave Peter the keys to the kingdom to have us trust Peter to give us Acts 2:38 as the answer to "what shall we do".

Jesus wants us to ignore Peter per Acts 2:38?

38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.... 16 (For as yet he was fallen upon none of them: only they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.)... 47 Can...

Everyone knows the Acts is the actions of the apostles, not a letter to saved saints. It is a documentary to Theophilus as a historical account of what happened after Jesus ascended after the great commission. It is intended as a history lesson, not salvation instruction to the saints of the...

The general epistle to the church of Theophilus?

I only trust Peter(the lone man that Jesus gave the keys in Matt 16), not modern theologians that are trying to keep us from remission of sins as per.... 38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall...

This entire post exclaims that Paul debunked Peter within a 10 year time span of Acts 2:38's inception as the plan of salvation to mankind. This doctrine of debunking Peter comes right out of modern seminary. The modern seminary is the official HQ of the protestant Acts Skippers Society, which...

Did you all see this??? He says Acts 2:38 is not the gospel, but the epistle to the saved saints of Rome is the gospel. This is the definition of Acts skipping. Acts 2:38 is BAD NEWS to the Acts skipper.

I have noticed that Acts skippers will not quote Acts 2:38. I dare any Acts skipper to quote it today.

If you love Acts 2:38, then quote it and prove it.....

Okay, what is more important here?... 38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. ...or, are they both EQUALLY important? I mean, can you enter heaven without...

I only posted Acts 2:38. You read it as a lie. Is Acts 2:38 a lie?... 38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

Is this out of context, or is your vision out of context?... 38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. 38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized...

Now that you found boldness to post how Paul commanded REBAPTISM in the name of Jesus, I must point out that he made it essential. He made it equally essential as having the receive the Holy Ghost. This is cool because as in the passage, they had to qualify for the Holy Ghost via being...

Good morning Acts skippers. Sleep well? I wouldn't sleep either if I realized I skipped Acts 2:38. I would make it a priority to be baptized in the name of Jesus for the remission of my sins today, if I found that out. I would worry about my "theological differences" some other time. First...

No, baptized in the name of Jesus for the remission of their sins. I caught that, Acts skipper. The Holy Ghost came after, as per Acts 2:38.

Yes, the Acts/Mark skippers wish that passage would go away, even calling it a forgery because it irks them.

This is evidence from an Acts skipper that they teach that Paul stole Peter's keys.