Search results

I am not talking about the average testimony. Only those that do not add up to simple common sense. Mike Warkne, John Todd are examples. I post much on this in the Holloween thread and many or some of those posts are being deleted. Oh Well

Good discussion, at least interresting, I have nothing to say. Mark your calendars. :cool:

hobie your post is nonsense. The great apostasy is still fulture, just before the AntiChrist.

Our belief that infants go to heaven is not a guarantee. Pastor's use that viewpoint to help partents during child loss.

They already use that.

I was posting what well known Biblical Language Scholars know.

IF Jesus had a sin nature, then he could not be a lamb without blemish.

There have always been cults, such as the Christadelphians, that teach Jesus had a sin nature. Did Jesus Have a Sin Nature? - Blog - Eternal Perspective Ministries https://www.andrews.edu/~fortind/EGWNatureofChrist.htm

2 Samuel 22:3 He is my God, the Rock I run to for protection. He is my shield; by his power I am saved. He is my hiding place, my place of safety, high in the hills. He is my savior, the one who rescues me from the cruel enemy. Psalm 18:2 The Lord is my Rock, my fortress, my place of safety...

While just posting facts, I have been acussed of offending others. I apologized to them. Some people don't like the facts.

I already explained it, why repeat your post as if I did not answer?

When Jesus uses me to convert one to him. I have them call a fellow Christian to share their testimony. But, when a testimony is unreal, outragious, we must evaluate it honestly. Especially if it published in a book format. I am not talking about the everyday praise report.

There have been Christian Celebrities, whoose testimonies have been proved as false, a fraud. Thus it is neccesary for us to learn how to test stories. I agree, with the average Christian looking for the fruit and II Peter 1 in our life applies. But, when a testimony is weird, it needs to be...

Someone asked why JW's are unable to accept truth and answer simple questions. I am only posting the well known facts. Also, I have answered their views with well known learned Scholars of Church History, Biblical Languages and so on. Please read them, thank Bro.

No one is saying there are two gods. Humans have Human Children.

Articles... The Text and Grammar of John 1:18 Dan Wallace The One and Only Son Richard Longenecker Blogs... John 1:18 in the Sahidic Coptic Translation

monogenhV qeoV Ò wn ton kolpon tou patroV ekeinoV exhghsato MONOGENÊS THEOS hO ÔN TON KOLPON TOU PATROS EKEINOS EXÊGÊSATO [The} one and only God who is in the bosom of the father, [he] has explained [Him]. MONOGENÊS

McReynolds and Harris make the same point.4 Had John wished to use monogenês unambiguously as an adjective, he could have written ho theos ho monogenês. He could also have made the adjectival force far more likely by writing ho monogenês theos. Instead, he wrote simply monogenês theos, using...

Translating Monogenês There are two significant difficulties the translator must resolve when rendering monogenês in English: What does the word mean and does it function as an adjective or as a noun? The first difficulty is complicated by a long tradition of translating monogenês as...

Only Son or Only God? The initial problem is a textual one. Of the thousands of early Greek New Testament manuscripts, there are four principal textual variants of this phrase. We first need to establish which variant we believe represents the original text, then move from there into possible...