Search results

Again forum rules prevent me from properly responding to this nonsense.

Which translation is that?

More evidence you deny the plain reading of scripture. What has more authority, my argument or the Word of God?

To be honest I don't care about this. You can knock holes in Amillennialism just like you can Premillennialism. I have admitted that Amillennialism is a valid view. WPM thinks it is the only view. It has nothing to do with your salvation so I'm not going to argue about it. I have had this...

The Son is begotten.

Forum rules prevent me from responding in kind.

Jhn 1:18 No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him. NASB95 Jhn 1:30 “This is He on behalf of whom I said, ‘After me comes a Man who [fn]has a higher rank than I, for He existed before me.’ NASB95

I thought the NASB was the most accurate translation, why would you go back to the KJV? I thought it was translated by Trinitarians.

Amillennialism is a valid view, so is premillennialism. I use to believe as you do about the animal sacrifices but after more study I changed my view. I'm not running from anything, I have had this debate before and neither side changes their mind. I don't have to prove or justify anything to you.

I used to agree with you but I no longer do nor do I care to debate this issue. You either believe it's about a future temple or you don't. You are declaring people who believe in the millennium heretics. You think only your view is valid. I'm glad you have so much confidence but you may be wrong.

People often ask, “If Jesus’ sacrifice was the only efficacious, once-for-all sacrifice to expiate sin (Heb. 9:12), why should animal sacrifices, which could never take away sin (10:4), be offered in the Millennial Temple during the Millennium?” It is true the sacrifices in the Millennial...

Jhn 1:18 No one has seen God at any time; God the only Son, who is in the arms of the Father, He has explained Him. Jhn 1:30 “This is He in behalf of whom I said, ‘After me is coming a Man who has proved to be [fn]my superior, because He existed before me.’

No

Y You just want to argue. I already explained my view

The Bible Answer Man Hank Hanagraff agrees with you

I still have not heard anything. Maybe I will today. I'm praying there are no issues because of my prescriptions. My leg is a little sore is all.

No. Tertullian subscribed to Montanism. He is mentioned in the article and reading about him mentions his belief in Montanism

Montanism - Wikipedia

John 1 :: New American Standard Bible 2020 (NASB20)

The word Trinity is not found in the Bible