Search results

That's because they don't want to discuss the thing that they're well known for. If it's a part of their beliefs, I don't understand why it can't be discussed. It's a serious subject and no one wants to talk about it. Why?

And those we feel are walking in error? You would have us look the other way?

He doesn't understand the concept of "the third person".

John 14 (NKJV) 26 But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you. 1 John 2 (NKJV) 27 But the anointing which you have received from Him abides in you, and you do not need that...

Then what's the point? Seriously. If we believe someone is lying in regards to the christian faith, we're supposed to just let it go? Really? Then what about this? James 5 19 Brethren, if anyone among you wanders from the truth, and someone turns him back, 20 let him know that he who...

No......this is what I said, I see no implications there of anything being less than the truth.

2+2=5

Why do you feel the average christian is stupid?

Why is it less than the truth?

The average Christian doesn't have access to that information and has to make a determination of it's interpretation based on how it is written or worded.

I agree. I believe the phrase "the other scriptures" or "the rest of the scriptures" implies that Paul's writings are on par with what people believed were the holy scriptures. (old testament scriptures) But that's just me. .

So what do you believe "the rest of the scriptures" or "the other scriptures" means?

The rest of the scriptures are the other scriptures. They both mean the same thing. "The other scriptures" and "the rest of the scripture" simply indicate the presence of other scriptures besides Paul's and that people are twisting Paul's word's just like they do with the rest of the...

Perhaps.

Here are my thoughts on habitual long posts. Ecclesiastes 5 3 For a dream comes through much activity, And a fool’s voice is known by his many words. It's all cut and paste. If they had to type those posts out by hand, we'd see a lot less of them. It's lazy evangelizing. .

Oh I could add a lot, but what would be the point? You've exposed yourself. No one needs to say anything, you've said it all. Your confrontational towards anyone who doesn't give you kudos. We're not the problem. It's your debate etiquette. It's missing from your behavior.

Here's how I explained it a few pages back. The New Testament didn't exist but the scriptures did. The scriptures that are being twisted in 2 Peter 3:16 are Paul's. Notice what it says. Paul's teaching's are hard to understand and people who lack understanding twist his teaching's to their own...

The title of the thread is "Catholics".

So when is a good time to tell someone they're walking in error?

Of course.